1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GREYUIT [131]
3 years ago
13

CAN SOMEONE ANSWER 2 AND SHOW WORK THANK U LOVES

Mathematics
1 answer:
Rzqust [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

16x^2-24x+9

Step-by-step explanation:

expand equation:

(4x-3)(4x-3)

distribute:

4x(4x-3) - 3(4x-3)

distribute:

16x^2-12x - 12x+9

combine like terms:

16x^2-24x+9

hope this helps!

You might be interested in
Compare. Select &lt;, &gt;, or=.<br> 3.568 ? 3.577
alexira [117]

Answer:

3.568 < 3.577

Step-by-step explanation:

3.568 < 3.577

So 3.577 is greater than 3.568

5 0
3 years ago
A 26' long painting is how many yards long
Vlada [557]
1 yard equals three ft so 26 / 3
8 0
3 years ago
9y = 3y Combine the like terms
-BARSIC- [3]
9y-3y=0
6y=0

Hope that helps
5 0
3 years ago
Evaluate<br> 3/2+(-k)+(-2) where k= -5/2
marusya05 [52]
Here’s the answer: 3/2-5/2= -3. Did this help
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Calcium is essential to tree growth because it promotes the formation of wood and maintains cell walls. In 2010, the concentrati
sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer:

The p-value obtained from the hypothesis test is greater than the significance level at which the test was performed, hence, we fail to reject the null hypothesis & say that there isn't enough evidence from the sample to conclude that the the calcium concentrations have changed since 2010.

Step-by-step explanation:

To perform this test, we need to first obtain the sample mean and sample standard deviation.

The data is 0.065 0.087 0.070 0.262 0.126 0.183 0.120 0.234 0.313 0.108

Mean = (sum of variables)/(sample size)

= (0.065+0.087+0.070+0.262+0.126+0.183+0.120+0.234+0.313+0.108)/10

= 0.1568 milligram per liter

Standard deviation = σ = √[Σ(x - xbar)²/N]

Σ(x - xbar)² = 0.00842724+0.00487204+0.00753424+0.01106704+0.00094864+0.00068644+0.00135424+0.00595984+0.02439844+0.00238144

= 0.0676296

σ = √[Σ(x - xbar)²/N] = √(0.0676296/10) = 0.08224 milligrams per liter

To do an hypothesis test, we need to first define the null and alternative hypothesis

The null hypothesis plays the devil's advocate and usually takes the form of the opposite of the theory to be tested. It usually contains the signs =, ≤ and ≥ depending on the directions of the test.

While, the alternative hypothesis usually confirms the the theory being tested by the experimental setup. It usually contains the signs ≠, < and > depending on the directions of the test.

For this question, the null hypothesis would be that there is no significant evidence to suggest that the the calcium concentrations have changed since 2010. That is, the calcium concentrations haven't changed since 2010.

The alternative hypothesis is that there is significant evidence to suggest that the the calcium concentrations have changed since 2010. That is, the calcium concentrations haven't changed since 2010.

Mathematically,

The null hypothesis is represented as

H₀: μ = 0.11 milligrams per liter

The alternative hypothesis is given as

Hₐ: μ ≠ 0.11 milligrams per liter

To do this test, we will use the t-distribution because no information on the population standard deviation is known

So, we compute the t-test statistic

t = (x - μ₀)/σₓ

x = sample mean = 0.1568 milligram per liter

μ₀ = the mean calcium concentrations from 2010 = 0.11 milligrams per liter

σₓ = standard error = (σ/√n)

where n = Sample size = 10

σ = Sample standard deviation = 0.08224 milligrams per liter

σₓ = (σ/√n) = (0.08224/√10) = 0.026

t = (0.1568 - 0.11) ÷ 0.026

t = 1.80

checking the tables for the p-value of this t-statistic

Degree of freedom = df = 10 - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9

Significance level = 0.05

The hypothesis test uses a two-tailed condition because we're testing in two directions. (Greater than and less than)

p-value (for t = 1.80, at 0.05 significance level, df = 9, with a two tailed condition) = 0.105391

The interpretation of p-values is that

When the (p-value > significance level), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and when the (p-value < significance level), we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.

So, for this question, significance level = 0.05

p-value = 0.105391

0.105391 > 0.05

Hence,

p-value > significance level

This means that we fail to reject the null hypothesis & say that there isn't enough evidence to conclude that the the calcium concentrations have changed since 2010.

Hope this Helps!!!

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • mr thompson makes two rectangular dog runs. the first dog run is 2 meters wide and 4 meter long. the second dog run has the same
    15·1 answer
  • 6x=30 how do you solve
    8·1 answer
  • Which equation is equivalent to -3 x + y equals 5
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose that the width of a certain rectangle is 1 inch more than one-fourth of its length. The perimeter of the rectangle is 42
    8·1 answer
  • 8. What is the equation of the line that contains (2, 3) and is perpendicular to the line y = 2x + 3?
    13·1 answer
  • Find the number of terms, n, of the arithmetic series given a1=11, an=95, and Sn=689.
    11·1 answer
  • AABC is reflected over the x-axis. What will be the coordinates of C' ?
    5·2 answers
  • What is the solution of the system? Use any method.
    5·2 answers
  • Find y if the line through the points (-4,y) and (8,2) has a slope of -1/3
    15·1 answer
  • Girlcome 5324611502 <br>p:1234​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!