Answer:
Odysseus was able to maintain his power over Ithaca through his reputation.
Explanation:
The Odyssey is an epic written by Homer. The epic narrates the story of Odysseus, who is after winning the Trojan War was adrifted in sea for ten years.
This book by Homer narrates his story of homecoming and union with his family.
<u>Odysseus was the King of Ithaca and was able to maintain his power even when he was not there in Ithaca for ten years. </u><u>It was because of Odysseus's reputation, that he was able to maintain his power</u><u>. He was not just a great man of valor but also skilled in plowing, carpentry, etc. He was also valued for his wit. Thus he gained a good reputation in his fellow citizens heart that allowed him sustain his power even he was away from his kingdom forten years.</u>
Answer:
Well, first you'll have to identify themes of their rule.
Style of rule -
NII was obviously an autocrat (even though he, in theory anyway, had a representative body of the peoples, the Duma. But he hung onto his absolute rule with the Fundamental Laws (1905)), and Lenin had spoke alot of 'dictatorship of the proletariat,' both pretty absolute.
Repression (secret police, censorship) -
NII had the Okhrana, and tried to continue his father's 'Reaction.' Secret police for the
purpose of preserving the status quo, keeping the Tsars in power.
Lenin's Cheka was far more efficient, and though the total amount of the Cheka's victims in the civil war are officially 12,000 and something(wiki it), historians widely believe this figure to be in excess 500,000. Lenin therefore could be judged as the worse of the two.
Reform -
- NII - Illusory Reform (October Manifesto created the Duma, and as mentioned, this had no real authority),
- Stolypin's land reforms did almost nothing. Lenin issues the Workers Control Decree, and also
- the Bolshevik Land Decree - however these were only very temporary (before a return to a very
- authoritarian economic set-up (strict discipline etc). These therefore could also be judged as illusory.
Similarities-
- Both used concessions/reform in order to maintain control. Nicholas with the October Manifesto and
the creation of the Duma and Lenin with the NEP to appease the SR's and the rightists of the Bolsheviks.
- They both 'backtracked' on the reforms however with Lenin calling the NEP a 'tactical retreat' and would've
- reverted it had he been alive and Nicholas made the 1906 constitution/ Fundamental laws which limited the Duma's powers and maintained his position as an autocrat.
Technically speaking, it would be "family" that represents a social group that exists in all known cultures, since families are generally crucial for the survival of the individual.
The South Asians and Chinese immigrated to the Caribbean and South America to work as factory labor to fend for themselves.
<h3>Why did the Asians migrated to the Western sphere?</h3>
Majority of the Asian migration to Latin America in 1900s was because of the increase in high demand for manpower required for the expansion of capitalism in the western sphere.
Also, as the Asian had poor families who were on verge of starvation and suffering from trade wars, all these inflence their migration for better lives.
In conclusion, they immigrated to the Caribbean and South America to work as factory labor to fend for themselves.
Read more about Asian migration
<em>brainly.com/question/18388541</em>
