All categories

3 years ago

Graph each inequality.

Mathematics

1 answer:

GalinKa [24]3 years ago

6 0

Where are the numbers/inequality’s?

You might be interested in

The quotient of a number and 3 less than twice the number

sweet-ann [11.9K]

"The quotient of a number and 3 less than twice the number" would translate to the expression x/(2x-3)

Basically we have x up top the fraction and 2x-3 in the bottom denominator of the fraction. The slash / means divide

6 0

3 years ago

Hlp me with this math problem

zaharov [31]

Answer:

0.5l+0.2s

Step-by-step explanation:

0.10x5l equals 0.5l

0.10x2s equals 0.2s

7 0

3 years ago

214 out of 450 students went to a concert, what percent did not go?

Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

.75% .0075 of the people that went to the concert said they would go if they could not see the band again. To find this you simply divide 9 by 1200, which equals .0075

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A sneaker company can make 50 pairs of sneakers for every 6 yards of material. Make a table to show the relation between materia

Law Incorporation [45]

A sneaker company can make 50 pairs of sneakers for every 6 yards of material.

Then in each case you can consider proportion.

1. 50 pairs -- 6 yards,

80 pairs -- x yards.

Mathematically,

$\dfrac{50}{80}=\dfrac{6}{x},\\ \\x=\dfrac{80\cdot 6}{50}=9.6\ yards.$

2. 50 pairs -- 6 yards,

100 pairs -- x yards.

Mathematically,

$\dfrac{50}{100}=\dfrac{6}{x},\\ \\x=\dfrac{100\cdot 6}{50}=12\ yards.$

3. 50 pairs -- 6 yards,

120 pairs -- x yards.

Mathematically,

$\dfrac{50}{120}=\dfrac{6}{x},\\ \\x=\dfrac{120\cdot 6}{50}=14.4\ yards.$

4. 50 pairs -- 6 yards,

140 pairs -- x yards.

Mathematically,

$\dfrac{50}{140}=\dfrac{6}{x},\\ \\x=\dfrac{140\cdot 6}{50}=16.8\ yards.$

Thus, the table is

$\begin{array}{cc}\text{Pairs}&\text{Yards}\\50&6\\80&9.6\\100&12\\120&14.4\\140&16.8\end{array}$

The domain of the relation is the set $\{50,80,100,120,140\}$ and the range of the relation is $\{6,9.6,12,14.4,16.8\}.$ See attached diagram for the graph of the relation.