Even though the American adversarial process was modelled on the medieval way of solving disputes physically but the value in the process is that a trial proceeds with two parties using skills to oppose each other through argument.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Adversarial is a form of legal system where the parties to the case or put forth their arguments and tender their evidence either by bringing on record the document or examining the witnesses or by both in accordance with the law before the impartial and independent judge.
The case of each parted is presented by their respective attorneys. This system is essentially modelled on the medieval way of solving disputes by physical fights as the parties are essentially having the competing claims and are fight against each other but this fight is not the physical fight rather based on the arguments and conviction.
Explanation:
The United Kingdom (UK) constitution, being an unwritten one, relies on its Parliamentary sovereignty and rule of law to retain its authority in governing its four counterparts, namely England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. A constitution would provide for the establishment of various institutions of the State, regulation of relations between each institution and relations between the institutions and the citizens. The doctrine of separation of power is then introduced to regulate the constitution for more efficient check and balance of the governing minority. Aforementioned concept is particularly unique in the unwritten nature of the UK constitution as powers of each institution, the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary, are not codified nor listed on a tangible code of document that separation of power is diluted with a series of shared powers between each institution. Bound by conventions and ministerial responsibilities, coupled with recent reforms done to the UK constitution, occurrence of events involving an institution empowering over another is minimal albeit not having strict separation of powers.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is a true statement that the term ethics refers to accepted principles of right or wrong that govern the conduct of a person, the members of a profession, or the actions of an organization.
Ethical conduct means that one abides these principles and keeps to them. On the other hand, unethical conduct entails going against these accepted principles.
Answer:
D.A court may refuse to enforce an unconscionable contract as contrary to public policy.
Explanation:
An unconscionable contract is a contract that is extremely one-sided. In this type of contracts, one of the parties has no real choice to not participate. This is most often a consequence of the power and bargaining differences between the parties. When a court finds that a contract is unconscionable, they might declare it to be contrary to public policy. They might determine that the parties are to be released from their contract obligations.
