There are a lot of human rights. The right that protects your purchase is right to redress.
<h3>Who is entitled to have a redress?
</h3>
- An individual can be entitled to redress when they are of 18 years or cannot manage his or her own affairs.
In terms of business, Consumers also have the right to be compensated when they have cases such as misrepresentation, shoddy goods and unsatisfactory services. This helps to remove doubt and makes sure there is credibility of the producers and the goods being produced are of quality.
Learn more about right to redress from
brainly.com/question/3884093
The general rule is this: courts will not enforce illegal bargains. The parties are left where the court found them, and no relief is granted: it's a hands-off policy. The illegal agreement is void, and that a wrongdoer has benefited to the other's detriment does not matte
hope you like the answer
An illegal agreement under the common law of contract, is one that the court will not enforce because the purpose of the agreement is to achieve an illegal end. The illegal end must result from performance of the contract itself. The classic example of such an agreement is a contract for murder.
Explanation:
The increasing population and urbanization have resulted into changes in the land use pattern. Large scale forests have been destructed to expand land for cultivation.
Failure to comply with international norms and the lack of protection of human rights <em>weaken actions to establish, maintain and consolidate peace</em>
I believe if the are underange he may be forced unless certain situations things like joint custody might come into play. joint physical custody is where a court orders a child to spend a substantial amount of time with both parents during the course of the year. Second, joint legal custody is where, although one parent may have full physical custody, both parents must agree on any decisions that impact the child, such as their education, medical care and spiritual matters. Lastly, both joint physical and legal custody is a combination of the first two. IT IS ULTIMATELY up to the court to decide whether any type of joint custody is in the best interests of a child. If not, the parent with primary custodial rights over a child will get to decide what kind of visitation for the other parent is fair and reasonable. In many situations, this works out well for both parents and they can often come to an amicable arrangement regarding visitation hours and days.
