1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoundrel [369]
2 years ago
11

Suppose that Raphael, an economist from an AM talk radio program, and Susan, an economist from a school of industrial relations,

are arguing Over saving incentives. The following dialogue Shows an excerpt from their debate:
Susan: I think it's safe to say that, in general, the savings rate of households in today's economy is much lower than it really needs to be to sustain an improvement in living standards.
Raphael: I think a switch from the income tax to a consumption tax would bring growth in living standards.
Susan: You really think households would change their saving behavior enough in response to this to make a difference? Because I don't.


The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to_____________ . Despite their differences, with which proposition are two economists chosen at random most likely to agree?

a. Rent ceilings reduce the quantity and quality of available housing.
b. Immigrants receive more in government benefits than they contribute in taxes.
c. Having a single income tax rate would improve economic performance.
Business
1 answer:
kow [346]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a. Difference in values

b. a. Rent ceilings reduce the quantity and quality of available housing.

Explanation:

The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to <u>difference in values.</u>

Economists are known to disagree a lot with each other and this is down to them having different values and perspectives with regards to several economic decisions. This is why there are different economic theories subscribed to by economists such as Keynesian and New Classical theories.

Despite these disagreements however, there are certain things they would always agree on and one of those is that rent ceilings reduce the quantity and quality of available housing.

The logic behind this is that imposing a rent ceiling would dissuade real estate investors from putting in more money to develop properties because the rent ceiling would limit the returns that they can get.

Supply of real estate would also fall because less investors would go into the market because they would fear being unable to recoup adequate returns on account of the rent ceiling.

You might be interested in
Beginning Work in Process Inventory was 10,000 units that were 20% complete and 40,000 units started, with ending Work in Proces
lesya692 [45]

Answer:

Material EUP = 5000

Conversion Costs EUP = 51,200

Explanation:

Under weighted average method

Beginning Work in Process Inventory            10,000

Units Started                                                 <u>  = 40,000</u>

Units to account for                                           <u>50,000</u>

<em><u>In the Work In Process for Conversion Costs</u></em>

Beginning Work In Process (10,000*20 %)   = 2000 were complete

Work done on beginning inventory = 10,000- 2,000= 8,000

Units Started                                                   = 40,000

Add Ending Inventory (8000*40%)                 <u> 3200</u>

Units to account for =                                     <u>51,200</u>

5 0
3 years ago
you are billed $300 at 5% simple interest for 2 years but given an opportunity to pay only 3% compound interest for 2 years. Whi
balandron [24]
This question is a bit tricky to answer because it does not state how often interest rate is applied so lets say for the simple 5% interest rate the rate of interest was calculated after 2 years you would pay a total interest of $15 since interest was only calculated once but for the 3% calculating every year with compound it would be a total of 18.27 dollars in interest but then you would have to calculate the 5% simple interest the same way which would total to $30 if calculated once a year being more than the 3% compound. But lets say interest is calculated once a month your total for the 5% simple interest would be $360 dollars interest for those 2 years and the 3% compound would be $406.97 dollars in interest. So over all the less amount of times interest compounds the less interest there is making it more worth than the simple but if the compounding occurs more frequently the simple 5% interest is more worth it. In this situation I think it might just be yearly interest which makes the 3% compound more worth taking for this short amount of time.
6 0
2 years ago
An unusual development in the wake of the 2007-2009 financial crisis was that nominal interest rates on some financial instrumen
bogdanovich [222]

Answer:

c. The real interest rate is 1 percent and the expected inflation rate is minus 2 percent

Explanation:

Nominal interest rate = real interest rate + expected inflation rate.

For the third option, the nominal interest rate: 1% + (-2%) = -1%

For the first option, the nominal interest rate: 2% + 1% = 3%

For the second option, the nominal interest rate: 0 + 2% = 2%

For the fourth option, the nominal interest rate: -2% + 3% = 1%

I hope my answer helps you

4 0
3 years ago
You have found an asset with 12.60 percent arithmetic average return and a 10.24 percent geometric return. Your observation peri
adoni [48]

Solution:

In years      Best estimate of return            Working note

5                   12.36%              ((5-1)/(40-1)*0.1024)+((40-5)/(40-1)*0.126)

10                   12.06%             ((10-1)/(40-1)*0.1024)+((40-10)/(40-1)*0.126)

20                    11.45%               ((20-1)/(40-1)*0.1024)+((40-20)/(40-1)*0.126)

The formula for the return on assets is calculated by dividing the net income by the total average assets. The profit margin and total asset sales can also be represented as a consequence of this ratio. For the calculation of the total asset return, either formula may be used.

7 0
3 years ago
A pegged exchange rate means the value of the currency is fixed relative to a reference currency
ruslelena [56]
Are you asking if it’s true or false?
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The economy is in the horizontal portion of the AS curve, investment spending is interest insensitive and there is no liquidity
    8·1 answer
  • Primecoat Corporation could disseminate its annual financial statements two days earlier if it shifted substantial human resourc
    10·1 answer
  • This company was incorporated as a new business on January 1, 2019. The company is authorized to issue 50,000 shares of $5 par c
    6·1 answer
  • When you compose a presentation, you need to guide your audience through your story in the correct order. Using (blank) helps to
    6·1 answer
  • At a price of $8.5 per ticket, a musical theater group can fill every seat in their 1800 seat performance hall. For every additi
    7·1 answer
  • Both a call and a put currently are traded on stock XYZ; both have strike prices of $45 and expirations of 6 months.
    7·1 answer
  • Externalities affect the economic efficiency of a market equilibrium by causing a difference between:________
    11·1 answer
  • Jack earns $90,000 while Priscilla earns $130,000. A regressive social security tax of 5%, paid only up to $90,000, would mean t
    13·1 answer
  • A company reports the following income statement and balance sheet information for the current year:
    7·2 answers
  • Do you imagine yourself becoming an entrepreneurship and managing your business in the future?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!