1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LekaFEV [45]
3 years ago
8

Why did Japanese Americans sue the United States government?

History
1 answer:
Andrej [43]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Because they were put in internment camps because they were Japanese because the United States had the mentality of "one Japanese person did this to us so everyone from the same country as them must be bad as well"

Explanation:

so they were suing for basically putting innocent people in camps, taking them away from their homes, and making them suffer

You might be interested in
HEELPPP PLEAASSEEEEE!!!! 50 POINTSSS AND BRAINLIEST!!!!!!
oksano4ka [1.4K]
The case promoted equal integration for all children to help combat racial inequality in education, therefore the last choice is the correct answer!
4 0
3 years ago
Usually the flood season produced a "good Nile, “just the right amount of water. What might be the consequences of a "bad Nile"-
irina [24]
No crops will grow and no fertile crescent dried lands desert
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How have international relations shaped and guided the development of the United States, specifically the nation’s government, p
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

International relations, the study of the relations of states with each other and with international organizations and certain subnational entities (e.g., bureaucracies, political parties, and interest groups). It is related to a number of other academic disciplines, including political science, geography, history, economics, law, sociology, psychology, and philosophy.

The field of international relations emerged at the beginning of the 20th century largely in the West and in particular in the United States as that country grew in power and influence. Whereas the study of international relations in the newly founded Soviet Union and later in communist China was stultified by officially imposed Marxist ideology, in the West the field flourished as the result of a number of factors: a growing demand to find less-dangerous and more-effective means of conducting relations between peoples, societies, governments, and economies; a surge of writing and research inspired by the belief that systematic observation and inquiry could dispel ignorance and serve human betterment; and the popularization of political affairs, including foreign affairs. The traditional view that foreign and military matters should remain the exclusive preserve of rulers and other elites yielded to the belief that such matters constituted an important concern and responsibility of all citizens. This increasing popularization of international relations reinforced the idea that general education should include instruction in foreign affairs and that knowledge should be advanced in the interests of greater public control and oversight of foreign and military policy.

This new perspective was articulated by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson (1913–21) in his program for relations between the Great Powers following a settlement of World War I. The first of his Fourteen Points, as his program came to be known, was a call for “open covenants of peace, openly arrived at” in place of the secret treaties that were believed to have contributed to the outbreak of the war. The extreme devastation caused by the war strengthened the conviction among political leaders that not enough was known about international relations and that universities should promote research and teaching on issues related to international cooperation and war and peace.

International relations scholarship prior to World War I was conducted primarily in two loosely organized branches of learning: diplomatic history and international law. Involving meticulous archival and other primary-source research, diplomatic history emphasized the uniqueness of international events and the methods of diplomacy as it was actually conducted. International law—especially the law of war—had a long history in international relations and was viewed as the source of fundamental normative standards of international conduct. The emergence of international relations was to broaden the scope of international law beyond this traditional focal point.

6 0
3 years ago
What two commands did jesus give concerning lazarus before he could live a new life?
AveGali [126]
Arise <span>Lazarus or something like that.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Which of the following was a major cause of the 19th-century revolutions in
serious [3.7K]

The correct option is C). The success of revolutions in the United States and France.

<h3>What was a major cause of the 19th-century revolutions in Latin America?</h3>

The revolutions in Latin American, which took place during the late 18th and early 19th centuries, was influenced by the American and French Revolutions and had resulted in the creation of a number of independent countries in Latin America.

After the revolution, democracy became the dominant political system in Latin America.

European colonialism completely replaced the independent governments of Latin America.

Learn more about the revolutions in Latin America here:-

brainly.com/question/12405624

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the environments of early agricultural societies impact early villagers' diets?
    5·1 answer
  • After world war ii the australian government supported the development
    9·1 answer
  • Váhat was the biggest
    14·2 answers
  • 4. What did the Powhatan Indians do for Jamestown?
    12·1 answer
  • Study the image above which of the following would you please send the section labeled “G”?
    14·1 answer
  • Which speeches from Abraham Lincoln relate to the ideals set forth in the Declaration of Independence?
    13·2 answers
  • How many people pass away in a year​
    10·2 answers
  • Which action caused the Indian Removal Act of 1830 to be viewed as a horrific event for the
    10·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast
    7·1 answer
  • I'll give 100 points to talk
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!