The speaker is using allusion it this line.
Allusion is a figure of speech in which something outside of the source text is being referred to. So here, Bacchus, Satan, and the Hangman aren't actually characters in this literary piece of work, but the author is making a reference to them nevertheless.
Answer:
C is the answer.
Explanation:
A is wrong because "bologna sandwich on Mondays", "ham sandwich on Tuesdays", and "turkey sandwich on Wednesdays" is parallel.
B is wrong because "toilet runs, icemaker is broken, and faucet drips" is parallel.
C is correct because the 2 "how-to"s mess it up. If it were parallel, the third clause would also have a "how to".
Talk: if the word "did"(helping verb) is in front of the word it is meaning that someone spoke in the past, but if the helping verb "will" is before the word it means that someone is going to speak in the future (most likely about to start talking)
talk-"ing": the same thing as "talk" EXCEPT "ing" is a suffix which means presently, so "talking" means that someone is currently speaking.
talk-"ed": once again the same thing, however, the suffix "ed" means already DID or in the past.
talk- "en": actually this is sadly not an english word, but the suffix "en" means made of. For example, "golden" means MADE OF gold.
Hope this helped:)
Explanation:
The irony in this question is that Mr. Goodenwell was trying to keep his son safe and in the act of this his son got hurt with part of the equipment that was supposed to keep him safe.
Answer:
I like that the film version tells the story better for Jim Valentine because in the film we can get a better idea of what the characters look like. The film version gives us something that we can’t experience in a book like emotions and facial expressions. For example, when the character is in a sad scene you can’t see how they react in a book but the film, you can see how they react. Also the picture of the setting we can hear how the music goes. With the play, the lighting will get darker and in the emotional scenes and get brighter and a happy scene. The scenes are best portrayed in the film. In the text, you can't hear their tone or you can’t see the setting or the characteristics of the character. In conclusion, the film version is better at telling the story of Jim Valentine because it gives us a better picture of the story.
Explanation:
i hope this helps i revised it a bit added puctuations comas and fixed run on sentences
