Answer:
It's still benefited mostly the upper class citizens.
Explanation:
The current system of democracy allow the citizens to buy influence within the government by using their wealth. They did this by donating in Political Action Committee that help a certain candidate win the election.
Because of this, The Rich and Powerful people have more chance to influence the government by electing the candidate that will pass a set of legislation that will benefit them. The poor citizens are not capable to give such donation
Answer:
Noel hypothesis.
Explanation:
The theory that best explains segregation under these conditions is the <em>Noel hypothesis</em>. The Noel hypothesis claims that if there is contact of groups were there is ethnocentrism, competition and differential in power, some dominant-minority group will be created. This will lead to inequality. Ethnocentrism is the belief in the superiority of our race and culture. It can make us view the other race as inferior. The three components of this hypothesis were present during the Jim Crow era.
Truthfully speaking there is none. There are plenty of "underprivileged"
people who have risen to success based on their determination. Everyone
has equal access to information because information is free. The only
reason someone would commit a crime is if they were brought up into
believing that that was what was expected of them from society due to
their geographical location, income, color, religion, etc. Those who are
determined to push past the narrative prove that "unequal access to
basic services" and crime are not directly related. Anyone who tells you
otherwise wishes you to remain a slave to the system because they
believe that being poor is where you belong and where you should stay.
The kind of question that you just made is described or
considered to be an open ended question. This type of question are usually
trying to ask for answers that are more knowledgeable and more meaningful in a
sense that it doesn’t have to be a short or reply but a more detailed or longer
one.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Before 1994, the whites of South Africa enjoyed a lot of privileges and the blacks of South Africa were actively discriminated against. When came the time to draw up a new Constitution, the whites would have wanted to protect these privileges as much as possible and the blacks would have wanted to take back those same privileges.
Drawing up a Constitution that would accommodate both views must have been quite difficult because they oppose each other and needed a compromise. Essentially, there was a need to draw a Constitution that would not enrage either race such that open hostility erupted between either of them so this was also a matter of preserving the peace.
