Answer:
probative value
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides legal protection against search and seizure without good reason and without a search and seizure warrant. As we can see from the question above, Mick Stoner was charged with marijuana, which was taken from a legal dispensary in Denver, seized without a search warrant, so Mick Stoner's defense attorney disputes the evidential value of the evidence, claiming that the truck's initial search violated the Fourth Amendment.
To dispute the probative value of the evidence means that the evidence gathered, in this case, is not guaranteed, by itself, to support a condemnatory sentence, thus requiring the repetition in court of some of the evidence produced.
Answer: its actually not a anime show its a anime movie its called "words bubble up like soda pop" :))
Denmark, New Zealand, Finland, Singapore, and Sweden are perceived as being the least corrupt nations in the world, ranking consistently high among international financial transparency, while the most perceivedly corrupt countries in the world are Syria, Somalia, and South Sudan, respectively scoring 13 and 11 out of ...
Answer:
A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation. Therefore, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
When someone uses libel law as a weapon to prevent speech from occurring, it is generally referred to as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP).
This ultimately implies that, a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a type of injunction obtained by a party, so as to intimidate, censor and silence activists, perceived enemies or critics based on slander, libel, defamation, interference, abuse of power etc. It typically involves a huge amount of money to defend a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)and as such, it used to buy time away from a litigation.