Which expression is equivalent to the expression below?<br> 7x+5y+x+x+x+x

Please can someone help! I will mark you branliest!

wariber [46]

27.47 should be the correct answer!

3 0

3 years ago

How many places do you need to move the decimal to the right to write

GenaCL600 [577]

Answer:

$7$ places.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are seven zeros, so in powers of ten notation it is written as $10^{-7}$

$2.1 \times 10^{-7}$

6 0

3 years ago

According to the ratio of the age, if Rs. 216 is divided to the girls of age 8, 9 ad 10 yearsHow much money will each get

SSSSS [86.1K]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

8 years: Rs. 64
9 years: Rs. 72
10 years: Rs. 80

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of ages is 8+9+10 = 27, so each year of age is rewarded by ...

216/27 = 8 . . . Rs

Then age 8 gets 8(Rs. 8) = Rs. 64

age 9 gets 9(Rs. 8) = Rs. 72

age 10 gets 10(Rs. 8) = Rs. 80

3 0

3 years ago

Mrs. Robinson, an insurance agent, earns a salary of $4,800 per year plus a 3% commission on her sales. The average price of a p

kap26 [50]

Answer:

$4800+183x\geq 8000$

She must sell at least 18 policies to make an annual income of at least $8,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $x$ be the number of policies Mrs. Robinson must sell

We know that Mrs. Robins makes 3% on commission for each policy sold. We also know that the average price of a policy is $6,100, so she makes 3% of $6,100 per policy sold. To find the 3% of $6,100 we just need to multiply 3% and $6,100; then dive the result by 100%:

$\frac{3*6,100}{100} =183$

Now we know that she makes $183 per policy sold. Since $x$ is the number of policies sold, $183x$ is her total commission for selling $x$ policies.

We also know that She makes $4,800 per year, so her total annual income is her salary plus her commissions, in other words:

$4800+183x$

Finally, we know that she wants to make at least $8,000, so her salary plus her commissions must be greater or equal than $8,000:

$4800+183x\geq 8000$

Let's solve the inequality:

1. Subtract 4800 from both sides

$4800-4800+183x\geq 8000-4800$

$183x\geq 3200$

2. Divide both sides by 183

$\frac{183x}{183} \geq \frac{3200}{183}$

$x\geq 17.48$

Since she can't sell a fraction of a policy, we must round the result to the next integer:

$x\geq 18$

We can conclude that she must sell 18 policies to make an annual income of at least $8,000.

7 0

4 years ago

Why might Razis method not be a good way to estimate the probability? My team won 18 of their last 20 matches, so the probabilit

FrozenT [24]

Answer:

It is a really idealistic way to estimate probability.

It usually works well for random events where there is no restriction like:

"There are N elements in a set, the probability of randomly selecting any element is the same (so there is no restriction) meaning that for every single element, the probability is 1/N.

Now suppose that there are K elements (K < N) with a given characteristic, then the probability of randomly selecting one of the K elements out of the sett with N elements is equal to K times the probability of each element, this is:

P = K*(1/N) = K/N"

Then if a dice has 6 possible outputs, and we want to find the probability of getting a 3 or a 5, we need to find the quotient between the outcomes where we get a 3 or a 5 (2) and the total number of outcomes (6)

P = 2/6

Now let's go to the case in the problem:

We know that out of the last 20 games, your team won 18.

Then yes, your team won (18/20)*100% = 90% of their played games.

Does this mean tath the probability of winning the next game is 90%?

Well no, because this is not a random selection, there are a lot of other things needed to analyze, as the win rate of the other team (suppose that the other team won 14 of their last 20 games, then their win rate is (16/20)*100% = 70%

Does this mean that the probability where our team wins is 90%, and the probability of the enemy team winning is 70%?

Well no, this makes no sense at all, and this is why this method is not a good way to estimate probability in complex cases like this one.

5 0

3 years ago

Which expression is equivalent to the expression below? 7x+5y+x+x+x+x