Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81ccd/81ccd12946120d6a957449cf52a109cb97d594fa" alt="\mu_ 1 = \$239,000"
The sample mean for Ascension parish is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0137d/0137d80aaeff064f523ca37dc167f39732494063" alt="\= x_2 = \$246,000"
The p-value is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f116/0f116e7b13e60c4b6d93b92644247c8c2e1e97f3" alt="p-value = 0.045"
The level of significance is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40343/4034370b517f80a736edc22d636ba17d41655137" alt="\alpha = 0.01"
The null hypothesis is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d471/6d4716a8ac84ea5475f0c88b414b5b1b24472514" alt="H_o : \mu_2 = \mu_1"
The alternative hypothesis is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c95f/6c95f534b68df6286e84d2929f3d35a837ba6e90" alt="H_a : \mu_2 > \mu_1"
Here
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e70ff/e70ff5c6dd3ae54589293d779fad78f6a6a49dd3" alt="p-value > \alpha"
So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Anything between 71.5 and 72.499 recurring.
Hope this helps :)
Use the formula SA=a+1/2ps
a=area of the base
p= perimeter of the base
s= slant height
Answer:
The LCM of 10, 12, and 18 is 180.
HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!!!!!!!XDDDDDDDD
0.9x = 450
x = 450/0.9
x = 500
Answer = 500