Which statement best describes a disadvantage of indirect democracy over direct democracy?

Social Studies

2 answers:

umka21 [38]3 years ago

8 0

CORRECT ANSWER~(B) it is not guarantee that individual voices will be considered

IgorLugansk [536]3 years ago

7 0

Indirect democracy means that people don't vote themselves, but that they choose representatives to vote for them.

It's typically more efficient than direct democracy, because less people need to directly participate - only the representatives.

however, the disadvantage is that some people's voices won't be heard - so the correct answer is B, for example when their representatives are not aware of them.

You might be interested in

What does Alexander Hamilton argue about the duties of elected representatives in a republic?

wel

Answer:

Explanation:

What did Hamilton argue against?

Hamilton warned against political intolerance

Although he fought the British during the Revolution, after the war he defended the rights of Tories against loyalty tests and property confiscations. He warned that the modern trend toward liberty could be reversed if the United States became politically intolerant.

4 0

2 years ago

PLEASE<br>I need help on 12, 13, & 14

lana66690 [7]

A bill of attainder
two thirds the house wants it
James maddison

4 0

4 years ago

Alliteration is the repetition of

melisa1 [442]

Alliteration is the repetition of a letter at the start of or during a word.
i.e. Coca-Cola, PayPal, Bed Bath & Beyond, etc...

5 0

3 years ago

Please help!!!! ANSWER IN THE NEXT 5 MINUTES.The psychologist that developed a hierarchy of human needs is

sveta [45]

C. Abraham Maslow hope this helps :)

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

All sages provide both wisdom and inspiration. Since Dashaâs speech contained wisdom and greatly inspired her audience, Dasha is

aksik [14]

Answer:

c. Just because Dasha satisfied two requirements of being a sage doesnât necessarily mean that she satisfies all the requirements of being a sage.

Explanation:

This can be explained by perspective of Western Logic.

Let : Sages = S ; Wise & Inspiring = P

'All sages provide wisdom & inspiration' implies 'All S are P'

But 'All S are P' doesn't necessarily imply 'All P are S'

So : 'All saints are wise & inspiring people' doesn't necessarily imply 'All wise & inspiring people are saints'

Therefore : Dasha, being a wise & inspiring person doesn't garauntee that she is a saint. Hence, wisdom & inspiration satisfy only two requirements of being a sage doesn't necessarily mean that she satisfies all the requirements of being a sage.

7 0

3 years ago