All of these would be perfectly fine represented by a pie chart except A, which doesn't add to 100%.
The question seems to be getting at the idea that a pie chart might be better when the slices are all visually different sizes. I don't really think that's right; a pie chart for D say, where the two slices are about the same, gives the correct impression of the relative frequencies, which are about the same.
Answer they're looking for: C
By critically observing the two triangles, we can deduce that they: B. might not be congruent.
<h3>The properties of similar triangles.</h3>
In Geometry, two triangles are said to be similar when the ratio of their corresponding sides are equal in magnitude and their corresponding angles are congruent.
By critically observing the two triangles, we can logically deduce that the three angles of both triangles are congruent in accordance with AAA similarity postulate:
However, AAA isn't a congruence postulate and as such all similar triangles might not be congruent.
Read more on congruency here: brainly.com/question/11844452
#SPJ1
<u>113.04 ft2</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
r=d/2=12/2=6
A= pi*r*r=3.14*6*6
A=113.04
7/50 = 0.14
0.14 x 100 = 14
14%
18/20 = 0.9
0.9 x 100 = 90
90%
