Answer:
Approximately 8.12%
Explanation:
The annual rate of return is computed using the compounding formula below:
FV = P(1 + r)^n
Where FV = future value of investment
P = Principal
r = rate of interest per period
n = number of period
FV = $22,000
P = $14,850
r = Unknown
n = 5
22,000 = 14,850(1 + r)^5
22,000/ 14,850 = {14,850(1 + r)^5}/14,850
1.481481481 = (1 + r)^5
= (1 + r)
1.081780741 = 1+r
1.081780741 -1 = r
0.081780741 = r
Approximate 0.081780741 and convert to percentage
0.081780741 = 0.0812 *100% = 8.12%
Answer:
Remedies
a. The suing party is called the plaintiff. The party being sued is the defendant. Therefore, since Arthur Rabe wants to sue Xavier Sanchez. Rabe is the Plainttiff and Sanchez is the Defendant.
b. If Rabe wants Sanchez to perform the agreement as promised, Rabe would seek remedy of Specific performance of Contract from the Court. Failure to do so will attract charges.
c. If Rabe wants the contract to be cancelled, then Rabe would ask the court for a rescission which is the cancellation of a contractual obligation.
d. The term remedies refers to a legal means to enforce a right or redress a wrong. Remedies of law include land, items of value or money. Remedies in equity includes specific performance, injunction and rescission. Thus, both remedies in part b and c are remedies in equity.
e. The party appealing a case is called the appellant or petitioner while the appellee is the party against whom the appeal is taken. So Sanchez would be the appellant and Rabe would be the respondent.
Foreign companies that operate in Mexico with privileges in exchange for hiring Mexican citizens are known as maquiladoras.
<h3>What are maquiladora industries</h3>
Correspond to manufacturing and service destination factories for making, transforming or repairing foreign goods such as the US. These industries exist in peripheral countries, where there is cheaper labor and less bureaucracy.
Therefore, in Mexico, the installation of maquiladora industries received government incentives in programs carried out by Mexico and the USA, generating more jobs for local workers and reducing costs for transnational companies.
Find out more information about transnational companies here:
brainly.com/question/6765390
Answer: d) both B and C
Explanation: Nash equilibrium is a concept within game theory where the optimal outcome of a game is where there is no incentive to deviate from their initial strategy.
Because if Sarah hit Tom, they will both experience a loss of 10 points
Also, not telling gets Tom a loss of 5 but Sarah will gain 5.
This will keep both of them in a nash equilibrium.
Answer:
The answer is B: At the midpoint of the project, members realize that their behavior pattern must change in order to complete the project on time.
Explanation:
Punctuated equilibrium is a concept in both biology and business where long periods of relative stability are often followed by growth spurts.
The punctuated-equilibrium model argues that groups usually move forward during bursts of change after going for long periods without change.
In the answer B, this concept is captured as group members of a project realise somewhere at the midpoint, that their behavior pattern must change in order to complete the project on time.
This shows that a period of relative stability was observed and then a short period of growth will be observed during the project lifecycle. This agrees with the development pattern known as punctuated equilibrium.