Abc migrated to a Corporation type of company to reduce cost.
Full question:
In some states and localities, scalping is against the law although enforcement is spotty
A. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets.
B. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a strongly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets
Answer and Explanation:
A. For the first scenario, a weakly enforced antiscalping law would still allow the resale of tickets as it is not enforced properly. Therefore it's effect on price would remain as though there were no laws restricting scalping( scalping: price increase created by artificial shortage and bulk resale of tickets) . See the attached diagram for the supply and demand curve and price increase as a result of a weak antiscalping law
B. For the second scenario, scalping has no effect on price as antiscalping laws are strong and therefore there is no scalping. Price remains the same and does not change.
In diagram A for first scenario price increases from p1 to p2 and quantity decreases from q1 to q2 to indicate increase in price and quantity decrease for shortage respectively. This shows the effect of scalping on the market with weak antiscalping laws
In diagram B, price and quantity remain the same to show strong antiscalping laws
Answer:
$25,000
Explanation:
The cash balance at the end of the year can be calculated as follows:
=> $12,000 + $2,000 + $7,000 + $4,000
Answer:
$10,000 increase in stockholder equity
Explanation:
The buying of treasury stock reduces the balance of stockholder equity but when the treasury stock is reissued or we can say after purchase, the sale of treasury stock is done for $10,000. So, it increases the balance of stockholder equity
It means that the purchase of treasury stock has an adverse impact on stockholder equity whereas reissued shares have a positive impact on stockholder equity