The ending equity is $315,000 This is just a matter of adding income and subtracting withdraws. So let's do it. "Cragmont has beginning equity of $277,000," x = $277000 "net income of $63,000" x = $277000 + $63000 = $340000 "withdrawals of $25,000" x = $340000 - $25000 = $315000
Answer: 1. No.
2. Yes.
Explanation:
Price Discrimination is a pricing strategy where suppliers/producers or sellers sell a good to different people at different prices depending largely on their preference and/or capacity to pay for the commodity i.e, if you want it more, you are charged more.
1. Johnny did not like to play Hopscotch, so offering Suzie one day of Hopscotch for two days of bug hunting is fair and no price discrimination occured as he did not offer these terms to someone else who's game he did not like.
2. Sam knew that Johnny really liked playing Slaps so he leveraged on that and offered him more expensive terms so to speak than he did to Bill even though he liked playing the both games equally. This means that he charged Johnny more than Bill simply because Johnny liked and preferred his game alot which is Price discrimination.
Income Approach seems to fit best but i'm not quite sure.
Sorry if it's wrong.
Answer:
2 tickets
Explanation:
the cost of membership is $25.
Cost of a ticket is $25
All cost get a 40 % dicsount
membersships earns a further 10% discount
total discount ofr membership eqauls 50%( 40+10)
There fore a member pays $ 12.5 { (50/100) $ 25) } for ticket
To get back cost of membership which is $25, a member need to buy 2 tricke { $25/12.5}
This most likely depicts an ethical problem because children may be deceived about what Barbie can do.
As some of these ads mix cartoon-type animation and “real” shots of the dolls, children may think that their Barbies can do specific types of actions based from the advertisement. This would also most likely lead to broken Barbies because children may copy the things that they saw in the ads. This is somewhat a form of false advertising.
