Answer:
The answer is: Intercultural communication
Explanation:
Intercultural communication is the term used to describe the interaction between the individuals of different ethnic groups or culture. It is also used to describe the communication issues that arise within a organization having individuals from various social, ethnic, educational, cultural and religious backgrounds.
Sonata form consists of three main sections - exposition, development, and recapitulation. <span>
Your answer would be A. recapitulation.</span>
Answer:
Socially or economically disadvantaged subjects should be excluded from research protocols that are not designed specifically for them, Option A.
Explanation:
A 'vulnerable population' is a group of individuals who need greater protection than the normal individuals in case they participate in a research, because a research may require include some risks. This type of population includes pregnant women, neonates, children, economically pr socially disadvantaged. Even who are terminally ill are included in such type of population.
They should not be included in research that are not meant specifically for them. They should not included by paying them a nominal amount or for phase 1 as stated in other options.
Hi there, @otakugirl87141!
I am pretty much certain that the key word you are searching for is: Socrates
The great teacher who used reasoning to guide a student to knowledge and truth was Socrates.
I wish for this answer to be helpful for you. Have a great day and let me know if you have further questions!
~Brooke❤️
Answer:
The field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of Dr. Original's original research. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Explanation:
It is acceptable for scientific research to be replicated by different researchers. However, the publication of a scientific research classified as a replica must contain credits to the original research, otherwise it will be considered plagiarism.
In this case, in relation to the example shown in the question above, we can say that the field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of the original research, carried out by Dr. Original. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.