All categories

3 years ago

What appears to be the scale factor used to create this dilation?

Mathematics

2 answers:

stealth61 [152]3 years ago

7 0

The answer is 0.5

Just take one point from the original shape and one from the transformed one. The just write the ordered pair out. Mine was (3,4) and (1.5, 2) Now in order for you to get from 3 to 1.5 you need to multiply 0.5 so the scale factor that was used is 0.5

Pls mark Braille at

MrMuchimi3 years ago

3 0

You have a lot of tabs open haha, and i think it’s .5

You might be interested in

Noam chose 3 songs from a pile of 20 songs to play at a piano recital. What is the probability that she chose The Entertainer, S

OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

3/20

Step-by-step explanation:

She chose 3 songs out of twenty so those three songs should be out of that twenty.

7 0

3 years ago

Which method would you choose to solve the following system?

gladu [14]

Answer: combining like terms

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Solve these recurrence relations together with the initial conditions given. a) an= an−1+6an−2 for n ≥ 2, a0= 3, a1= 6 b) an= 7a

8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

a) 3/5·((-2)^n + 4·3^n)
b) 3·2^n - 5^n
c) 3·2^n + 4^n
d) 4 - 3 n
e) 2 + 3·(-1)^n
f) (-3)^n·(3 - 2n)
g) ((-2 - √19)^n·(-6 + √19) + (-2 + √19)^n·(6 + √19))/√19

Step-by-step explanation:

These homogeneous recurrence relations of degree 2 have one of two solutions. Problems a, b, c, e, g have one solution; problems d and f have a slightly different solution. The solution method is similar, up to a point.

If there is a solution of the form $a[n]=r^n$ , then it will satisfy ...

$r^n=c_1\cdot r^{n-1}+c_2\cdot r^{n-2}$

Rearranging and dividing by $r^{n-2}$ , we get the quadratic ...

$r^2-c_1r-c_2=0$

The quadratic formula tells us values of r that satisfy this are ...

$r=\dfrac{c_1\pm\sqrt{c_1^2+4c_2}}{2}$

We can call these values of r by the names r₁ and r₂.

Then, for some coefficients p and q, the solution to the recurrence relation is ...

$a[n]=pr_1^n+qr_2^n$

We can find p and q by solving the initial condition equations:

$\left[\begin{array}{cc}1&1\\r_1&r_2\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{c}p\\q\end{array}\right] =\left[\begin{array}{c}a[0]\\a[1]\end{array}\right]$

These have the solution ...

$p=\dfrac{a[0]r_2-a[1]}{r_2-r_1}\\\\q=\dfrac{a[1]-a[0]r_1}{r_2-r_1}$

_____

Using these formulas on the first recurrence relation, we get ...

$c_1=1,\ c_2=6,\ a[0]=3,\ a[1]=6\\\\r_1=\dfrac{1+\sqrt{1^2+4\cdot 6}}{2}=3,\ r_2=\dfrac{1-\sqrt{1^2+4\cdot 6}}{2}=-2\\\\p=\dfrac{3(-2)-6}{-5}=\dfrac{12}{5},\ q=\dfrac{6-3(3)}{-5}=\dfrac{3}{5}\\\\a[n]=\dfrac{3}{5}(-2)^n+\dfrac{12}{5}3^n$

The rest of (b), (c), (e), (g) are solved in exactly the same way. A spreadsheet or graphing calculator can ease the process of finding the roots and coefficients for the given recurrence constants. (It's a matter of plugging in the numbers and doing the arithmetic.)

_____

For problems (d) and (f), the quadratic has one root with multiplicity 2. So, the formulas for p and q don't work and we must do something different. The generic solution in this case is ...

$a[n]=(p+qn)r^n$

The initial condition equations are now ...

$\left[\begin{array}{cc}1&0\\r&r\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{c}p\\q\end{array}\right] =\left[\begin{array}{c}a[0]\\a[1]\end{array}\right]$

and the solutions for p and q are ...

$p=a[0]\\\\q=\dfrac{a[1]-a[0]r}{r}$

Using these formulas on problem (d), we get ...

$c_1=2,\ c_2=-1,\ a[0]=4,\ a[1]=1\\\\r=\dfrac{2+\sqrt{2^2+4(-1)}}{2}=1\\\\p=4,\ q=\dfrac{1-4(1)}{1}=-3\\\\a[n]=4-3n$

And for problem (f), we get ...

$c_1=-6,\ c_2=-9,\ a[0]=3,\ a[1]=-3\\\\r=\dfrac{-6+\sqrt{6^2+4(-9)}}{2}=-3\\\\p=3,\ q=\dfrac{-3-3(-3)}{-3}=-2\\\\a[n]=(3-2n)(-3)^n$

_____

<em>Comment on problem g</em>

Yes, the bases of the exponential terms are conjugate irrational numbers. When the terms are evaluated, they do resolve to rational numbers.

6 0

3 years ago

Is the underlined verb in the sentence transitive or intransitive?

Firlakuza [10]

A because everything after the verb is a preposition

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Jack got the expression 7x + 1 and then wrote his answer as 1 + 7x. Is his answer an equivalent expression? How do u know? Expla

nadezda [96]

Yes, it is an equivalent expression because even though you move two pieces of an equation it will still equal the same thing, unless there are parentheses involved.

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers