the company would need to change the Cognitive <span>component of jerry's attitude
The cognitive component of an attitude consists of one's personal thought or beliefs toward that attitude.
In this case, Jerry already believed that jaguar always make bad products, so the company need to destroy this perception before they could obtain Jerry as a customer</span>
B) he though the landed off the coast of India because
he thought he could do that by moving west around the earth to India from europe.
Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
The answer I usually get (and I'm paraphrasing here) is that they disappear and are instead absorbed as heat energy.
But I find it hard to believe that the photon simply "disappears." Common sense tells me it must turn into something or other, not just simply poof out of existence; then again, common sense has betrayed me before.
Forgive me if this is obvious; high school physics student here who's just learned about light and is greatly confused by all this.
