Sin (x) = 12/13 this is because sine is opposite divided by hypotenuse.
cos (x) = 5/13 this is because cosine is adjacent divided by hypotenuse.
tan (x) = 12/5 this is because tangent is opposite divided by adjacent.
I know it’s not right, I think it’s obtuse
Domain of a set of ordered pairs
We know the domain is the set of all x when is represented by ordered pairs: (x, y)
In this case {(-8,-12),(4,-8), (2, -10),(-10.-16) } we can observe that there are four x (the first number of each pair):
Domain = { -8, 4, 2, -10}
<h2>Domain = {-10, -8, 2, 4}</h2>
We can solve this by drawing a triangle with three points. The first point at Fort Collins (F), the second at Cheyenne (C) and the third at Laramie (L).
The angle at F = 46.5, the angle at L = 43.6. We know the side opposite angle L = 3.2 (side FC), now we must solve for the side opposite angle F (side LC).
We can use the law of sines to solve this where:
sinA/a = sinB/b
sin43.6/ 3.2 = sin46.5/LC
LC = 3.2 (sin46.5/sin43.6)
LC = 3.37 inches
We are told 1 in = 10.6 miles, therefore:
3.37 inches x 10.6 miles/in = 36 miles from Laramie to Cheyenne.
Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
