The current ratio will remain the same as 1 only
The acid-test ratio will decrease.
- The current ratio will stay the same because there won't be a change in current liabilities, and the change in current assets won't have any net consequences because the asset will grow due to an increase in inventory, but it will also decrease by the same amount due to a decrease in cash, so the current ratio will stay the same.
- The acid-test ratio will decline since the numerator will shrink owing to a cash shortage, and the growth in inventory won't be taken into account because current assets aren't included in this ratio.
Learn about more acid-test ratios here
brainly.com/question/25814739
#SPJ4
Answer:
$140
Explanation:
Calculation for What is the least amount the government can spend to overcome the $350 billion gap
First step is to find the Multiplier using this formula
Multiplier=1(1-Marginal propensity)
Let plug in the formula
Multiplier=1/(1-0.6)
Multiplier=1/0.4
Multiplier=2.5
Now let calculate the least amount the government can spend using this formula
Least amount=Gap/Multiplier
Let plug in the formula
Least amount=$350 billion /2.5
Least amount=$140
Therefore the least amount the government can spend to overcome the $350 billion gap is $140
The choices can be found elsewhere and as follows:
<span>A. a market system
B. a planned system
C. a mixed system
D. none of the above
I think the correct answer is option B. </span>Cecelia's government can be considered a planned system. It <span>is an economic </span>system<span> in which inputs are based on direct allocation. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
Answer:
Sunk cost will be = $70
Explanation:
Sunk Cost refers to the cost for which the amount has been already spent, and cannot be recovered. These are generally incurred and then not regarded for decision making as irrespective of decision being viable or not this cost cannot be avoided.
In the given instance, Damon Rutton Purchased the ticket of $70
This is the only cost which has already been incurred, else other costs of parking and food will only be incurred if he visits the game of Sarasota Shippers.
When he spend some time with his wife sunk cost will be = $70
"Suppose an economist test the theory that when the price of leather increases, fewer pairs of shoes ..."His observations invalidate the testability of his hypothesis since they go against the ceteris paribus premise. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is an economist?</h3>
Generally, an economist is simply defined as a professional in economics.
In conclusion, To illustrate, "let's say an economist investigates the hypothesis that higher leather costs lead to fewer shoe purchases." Since his findings contradict the ceteris paribus premise, his hypothesis cannot be tested.
Read more about economist
brainly.com/question/14299791
#SPJ1
