The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
Answer:
None of the answer is correct.
Explanation:
When Marvin purchase stock in March 2020 at a price of $28. The exercise price for the stock is $20. When Marvin will sell the stock at the exercise price he will gain on the sale of the stock. AMT is the difference or spread between the stock exercise price and its underlying fair market value.
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
The LIFO conformity rule requires taxpayers that elect to use LIFO for tax purposes to use <u>no method other than LIFO to ascertain the income, profit, or loss for the purpose of a report or statement to shareholders, partners, or other proprietors, or to beneficiaries, or for credit purposes</u>.
Hence the IRS requires that the same method for income tax purpose be used for financial statement purpose
Answer:
150
Explanation:
As we know that
The marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) = Marginal product of labor ÷ Marginal product of capital
where,
The marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) = 0.20
And, the marginal product of labor is 30 chips per hour
So, the marginal product of capital is
= 30 chips per hour ÷ 0.20
= 150
The marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) shows a relationship between the marginal product of labor and the marginal product of capital
" There is an unequal distribution of power in the company " best explains this situation
Explanation:
Inequity is the almost inevitable result of two strong forces:
human bias and socioeconomic injustice.
One may debate whether or not power imbalances and other social inequalities induce bias.
(Even though the notion of a single variable approach to these debates encourages most of us, the truth is more complex; each one strengthens the other and this always results in a chicken and egg debate.)
Unfairness and discrimination can also be found interchangeably with everyday terminology.
I presumption a difference here: the definition of the word 'inequality' and the control of the expression 'inequity.' Inequality contributes to the allocation of such products, some of which earn more than others. Inequity stretches into this: not just unequal allocation; disproportionate and unjust allocation.
