A . is my thinking and answer
Answer:
It is there history of there creativity of making the design of the Rock for Kings and other richer people so that their place can look better then any other
Explanation:
Indian rock-cut architecture has more examples than any other form of rock-cut architecture in the world.
[1] Rock-cut architecture defines the practice of creating a structure by carving it out of solid natural rock. The craftsman removes rock not part of the structure until the architectural elements of the excavated interior constitute the only rock left. Indian rock-cut architecture, for the most part, is religious in nature.
[2] In India, caves have long been regarded as places of sanctity. Enlarged or entirely man-made caves hold the same sanctity as natural caves. The sanctuary in all Indian religious structures, even free standing ones, retain the same cave-like feeling of sacredness, being small and dark without natural light.
Curiously, Buddhist monks created their cave hermitages near trade routes that crossed northern India during the time of Christ. As wealthy traders became aware of the Buddhist caves, they became benefactors of expansion of the caves, the building of monolithic rock-cut temples, and of free-standing temples. Emperors and rulers also supported the devotional work and participated in the spiritual devotional services. Very likely, traders would use the hermitages for worship on their routes. As Buddhism weakened in the face of a renewed Hinduism during the eighth century C.E., the rock structure maintenance, expansion, and upgrading fell to the Hindus and Jains. Hindu holy men continued building structures out of rock, dedicating temples to Hindu gods like Shiva, until mysteriously they abandoned the temples around the twelfth century C.E. They abandoned the structures so completely that even local peoples lost knowledge of the awesome structures in their midst. Only in the nineteenth century, when British adventurers and explorers found them, did India rediscover the awesome architecture that comprises world treasures.
In the morning with the first rays of the sun, the peasant woke up in his small house, which was in a small village consisting of 11 courtyards. A big friendly peasant family gathered at breakfast: A peasant with his wife, 4 daughters and 6 sons. Having prayed, they sat down for wooden benches. At breakfast, there were grains cooked in a pot, on a home hearth. After breakfast peasant should work to provide food to the knights and nobles.
Almost all the children of the peasant have already worked as adults. Only the youngest son, who barely passed 5 years, could only graze geese. The harvest was in full swing. All day peasant with his family worked in the field, making only one break for lunch. In the evening they came home very weary. After supper, the peasant helps his wife in feeding the pigs and milking the cow. After that, the peasant began to make barrels for water. After sunset, everyone went to bed. Mother and father on a wide wooden bed, children on benches at walls which have covered with hay. Tomorrow morning the peasant with his family was going to getting up early again and working hard again...
<span>Tens of thousands of sub-Saharan Africans try to cross the Mediterranean each year because of various reasons: many tries to escape a life built on poverty and misery, other tries to get out from a very unstable country were they might not survive long or were there is a war in act, others tries to find a better life in the European countries, because there are no resources left in their own,
---
These refugees are commonly portrayed as dangerous people, perhaps people that come in the European country to stole jobs from Eupoean, or to take bits of help from the country there are in without contributing to the country, or they are criminals that do not want to work or pay taxes, or sometimes they are also portrayed as terrorist.</span>
The second one is the correct one
