Many plants depend on animals primarily insects for pollination and sexual reproduction. If the animals (insects that pollinate) most flowering plants would be unable to reproduce and would go extinct.
Both plants and animals undergo cellular respiration producing Carbon Dioxide. Animals produce only Carbon Dioxide while plants produce both Carbon Dioxide and Oxygen. If animals went extinct there would be less Carbon Dioxide to support photosynthesis and more complex plants would have a difficult time adapting to the reduced levels of Carbon Dioxide.
Plants that survived the extinction of animals would be much simpler than presently complex plants.
Perhaps some plants would become predators of other plants to absorb the nitrogen content of other plants because of the lack of animals to engage in the recycling of nitrogen content.
Answer:
If the father has hemophilia and the mother DOESN'T the daughters any will have and the sons won't. If the moms have it and the dad doesn't that means all of the sons will have it and the daughters won't
Explanation:
Mark as Brainliest
1st law—> a rider in the car may shift forward in his seat because of the rider's inertia if the car stops suddenly
2nd law—> the force exerted by the engine can be found if you know the car's mass and acceleration
3rd law—> the car applies a force to the ground and the ground exerts an equal but opposite force on the car
Answer:
It's B.
Explanation:
B. When there was more food to eat in 1989, the number of wolves in a pack increased.
If there's less prey, then there will also be less predators. If there's more, then more predators.
Because, as seen in the graph, it's the only thing that makes sense.
<em>(Then again, it looked kinda blurry to me.)</em>
Still hope this helps though.
