All categories

3 years ago

5. Solve y = ab - x for b.

Mathematics

2 answers:

ivanzaharov [21]3 years ago

7 0

Here is your answer ⬇️

Helen [10]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

(y+x)/a=b

or b=(y+x)/a

Step-by-step explanation:

First add both sides by x:

y+x=ab

Now divide a on both sides:

(y+x)/a=b

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in

LetF(x, y) be the statement "xcan fooly," where the domain consists of all people ofthe world. Use quantifiers to express each o

Sindrei [870]

Answer:

See steps below

Step-by-step explanation:

Let F(x, y) and W be

F(x,y) = “x can fool y”

W the set of all the people in the world

a) Everybody can fool Fred.

$\forall x \in W,F(x, Fred)$

b) Evelyn can fool everybody.

$\forall y\in W, F(Evelyn, y)$

c) Everybody can fool somebody.

$\forall x \in W,\exists y :F(x,y)$

d) There is no one who can fool everybody.

$\nexists x \in W: \forall y ,F(x,y)$

e) No one can fool both Fred and Jennifer.

$\nexists x \in W: F(x,Fred)\wedge F(x,Jennifer)$

f) Nancy can fool exactly two people.

$\exists x,y \in W:\forall z\neq x,z\neq y, F(Nancy,x)\wedge F(Nancy,y)\wedge (\neg F(Nancy,z))$

6 0

3 years ago

How to solve? I basically want to know the first step..

inessss [21]

You have to get x alone and then do the rest of the steps

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If m∠F = 90° and m∠G = 70°, then ∠F and ∠G are not supplementary.

miss Akunina [59]

a) Proof by contradiction is different from traditional proof as it accepts a single example showing that a statement is false, instead of having the need to derive a general relationship for all input values.

b) The statement is true by contradiction as the sum of the measures is of 160º, and not 180º.

<h3>What are supplementary angles?</h3>

Two angles are called supplementary angles if the sum of their measures has a value of 180º.

The measures of the angles in this problem are given as follows:

m∠F = 90°.

m∠G = 70°.

Then the sum of the measures of this angles is given as follows:

90 + 70 = 160º.

Which is a different sum of 160º, confirming the statement that the angles are not supplementary by contradiction.

A similar problem, involving proof by contradiction and supplementary angles, is presented at brainly.com/question/28889480

#SPJ1

5 0

10 months ago

Which equation shows that the Pythagorean identity is true for 0=270 degrees. select the equation that is in the form sin^2 0+co

Andru [333]

Answer:

c. (-1)²+0²=1

hope it is helpful to you.

5 0

3 years ago

The table shows data from a school exercise program. If Malinda jogs at the target rate, how far will she travel?

3241004551 [841]

There is no table!!!! Please put a table the next time!!!!

5 0

3 years ago