Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Idk the answer man u have to do it by urself
Answer:
<h2>The distance from the pitcher's mound and to second base is 37.99 approximately.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
The diamond is a square, which in this case has 50 feet long each side, and from home to pitcher is 38 feet. Notice that home is a vertex of the square and the pitcher's mound is the intersection of the diagonals, where they cut half.
We can find the distance from the pitcher to first base using Pythagorean's Theorem, where 50 feet is the hypothenuse.

Therefore, the distance from the pitcher to first base is 32.5 feet, approximately.
Now, we can use again Pythagorean's Theorem to find the distance from pitcher to second base, where the hypothenuse is 50 feet.

Therefore, the distance from the pitcher's mound and to second base is 37.99 approximately.
<em>(this results make sense, because the diagonals of a square intersect at half, that means all bases have the same distance from pitcher's mound, so the second way to find the distance asked in the question is just using theory)</em>
Step-by-step explanation: im not really sure what it is but if you are working from this probplem do pemdas-
perthises,expoment,mulicaion,divishoin,addishoin, subbtraion
hope this helped! sorry if i spelt these wrong....
<u>Answer:</u>
<u>1. A. You allow the passenger to board his flight when the passenger has a weapon.</u>
<u>2. B. You select the passenger for further inspection when the passenger has no weapon.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
1. Remember, a Type I error in simple words means that the assumption "the passenger has a weapon" (null hypothesis) is <em>actually true,</em> but the airport security screener <em>incorrectly concluded it is false. </em>In other words, he assumed the passenger had no weapon and allowed the passenger to board his flight <u>when he actually did have one.</u>
<em>2. While, </em><em>a </em><em>Type II error </em><em>means that </em>the assumption "the passenger has a weapon" (null hypothesis) is <em>actually false, </em>but the airport security screener <em>incorrectly concluded it is true. </em>In other words, he assumed the passenger had a weapon and selected the passenger for further inspection <u>when he actually didn't have one.</u>