1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Papessa [141]
3 years ago
5

Pls someone help these answers are on chegg so if u have a subscription pls answer these ill make u brainliest ! Below is a tabl

e representing data, measuring the percentage of various
groups owning a home
Percentage owning a
home
1st Generation
Hispanic Americans
N=899
43
50
2nd Generation
Hispanic Americans
N=351
1st Generation Asian
Americans N=2,684
2nd Generation Asian
Americans N=566
58
51
Test whether there is a significant difference in the proportion of
homeowners between 1st and 2nd generation Hispanic Americans. Set alpha at .05
The obtained Z test is ?
The probability of obtaining
this Z-test statistic is ?
This is _? Than our alpha level. Therefore we ___? The null hypothesis and conclude that there ____? A significant difference in the proportion of homeowners between 1 st generation and 2nd generation hispanic americans.
Mathematics
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]3 years ago
3 0

The table is not clear, so i have attached it.

Answer:

z statistic is -2.26

This is less than our alpha level,therefore we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the proportion of homeowners between first generation and second generation Hispanic Americans

Step-by-step explanation:

From the attached table, we can see that;

first-generation hispanic americans; (N = 899 and percentage = 43%

second-generation hispanic americans; N = 351 and percentage = 50%

first-generation asian americans; (N = 2,684 and percentage = 58%

second-generation asian americans; N = 566 and percentage = 51%

Z-score formula in this case is;

z = (p1^ - p2^)/(√(p^(1 - p^)((1/n1) + (1/n2))

Where;

p^ = (p1 + p2)/(n1 + n2)

For, hispanic americans we have;

p1^ = 0.43 × 899 = 386.57

p2^ = 0.5 × 351 = 175.5

p^ = (386.57 + 175.5)/(899 + 351)

p^ = 0.45

Thus;

z = (0.43 - 0.5)/(√(0.45(1 - 0.45)((1/899) + (1/351))

z = -2.26

From z-distribution table, we have;

P-value = 0.01191

Since we have 2 samples, then probability = 2 × 0.01191 = 0.02382

This is less than our alpha level of 0.05,therefore we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the proportion of homeowners between first generation and second generation Hispanic Americans.

You might be interested in
The owner of a building renovated 18 apartments. Painting cost $5580 and new lights cost $3186. What Was The Cost Of Each Apartm
Citrus2011 [14]
The answer is 133 dollars cuz 5580-3186 is 2394 and 2394 divided by 18 is 133
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
8989890+85769090790509709-590
stich3 [128]

Answer:

8.5769091e+16

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
I NEED HELP PLEASE! ITS DUE TOMORROW!! THANKS!
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Katie is not cheating. From the question, it sounds like Katie's spinner is 1-12. James has two dice so he has two sets of each number 1-6. This means that Katie can roll two numbers greater than six but James can only roll up to six. Using probability, I think there is a 50% chance that Katie's number will be bigger than James every time she spins. A fairer way would be for them both to play with the same dice or spinner.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
A line passes through (3, 7) and (6, 9). Which equation best represents the line?
lana [24]

Answer:

brainly.com/question/2574086b

Step-by-step explanation:

brainly.com/question/2574086

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP/ANSWER! From 1980 to 1990, Lior’s weight increased by 25%. If his weight was k kilograms in 1990, what was it in 198
Elena-2011 [213]

The weight in 1980 is \frac{4k}{5} kilograms

<em><u>Solution:</u></em>

From 1980 to 1990, Lior’s weight increased by 25%

His weight is "k" kilograms in 1990

<em><u>To find: weight in 1980</u></em>

This is a percentage increase problem

Let "x" be the weight in kilograms in 1980

<em><u>The percentage increase is given by formula:</u></em>

\text{Percentage increase } = \frac{\text{Final value - initial value}}{\text{initial value}} \times 100

Here,

Initial value in 1980 = x

Final value in 1990 = k

Percentage increase = 25 %

<em><u>Substituting the values in formula,</u></em>

25 = \frac{k-x}{x} \times 100\\\\25x = 100(k-x)\\\\x = 4(k-x)\\\\x = 4k - 4x\\\\5x = 4k\\\\x = \frac{4k}{5}

Thus the weight in kilograms in 1980 is \frac{4k}{5}

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select the three ratios that represent the number of blue marbles to red marbles.
    5·2 answers
  • Based upon extensive data from a national high school educational testing​ program, the standard deviation of national test scor
    11·1 answer
  • Convert 1.05 to a percent.<br> 1.05%<br> 0.105%<br> 10.5%<br> 105%
    12·2 answers
  • The area of the shape
    14·1 answer
  • Find the gcf of 12, 18, and 84
    6·2 answers
  • Jada drank 12 ounces of water from her bottle. This is 60% of the water the bottle holds. How much water does her bottle hold? *
    6·2 answers
  • What is 1/8% of 1000
    5·2 answers
  • 30\4m-2=5 what do I get it
    10·1 answer
  • What is the value of x?<br><br> −3/4(12−8x)=5x+15−7x
    12·1 answer
  • PLSSS HELP I'M DEAD
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!