Colonial subjects who choose to cooperate are often given a reward or status not otherwise given under the old rule. This was a common tactic of the British--pull underclasses into the military and/or government rule. By doing this, you get support, it is cost effective as the colony will govern itself, and you lessen the power of the old elite.
The old elite are more likely to react with violence or rejection of the colonial system. They are typically more equipped to fight against the colonial power. Additionally, members of the military, if replaced, may also rebel against the colonial power. Another factor contributing to rebellion, may be the removal of important traditions or religious rites.
Answer:
<u>The answer is constitutional monarchy. </u>
I took the test on Edgenuity 2020
hope it helps :)
1. I would say Beneficial because when he discovered the "west Indies" he brought back much treasures and gained spain lots of territory.
2. It would have been different because he could've just asked another country or he could have gave up and someone else might have found the new world.
3. This question is up to you...
America was named America after Amerigo Vespucci. Vespucci was an early explorer, who lived around the same time as Christopher Columbus.
No the mixed economics do not work to the degree that they embrace democracy.
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
When economic system blends elements of market economy along with the planned economy with private and public enterprises then it is defined as mixed economics.
When societies having different kinds of economies interact with each other then it cause the evolution of mixed economy. In mixed economy involvement of some government degree is always present, that's why mixed economy do not work to the degree that they embrace democracy.
