Answer:
Explanation:
The testimony by the bank employee that the photo accurately portrays the scene of the crime is only required because the photo is only being used as “demonstrative evidence,” and demonstrative evidence only needs to be authenticated to be admissible. Evidence is “authenticated” if there is testimony asserting that the evidence is what the proponent claims it to be.
Number 1 is not necessary because the photo is not being used as original evidence that played an actual role in the robbery itself; for example, a gun used by the robber, which would require a “chain of custody” type of authentication to be admissible.
The procedure of transferring journal entries to the ledger accounts is called accounting
Answer:
The description corresponds to an observational study.
Explanation:
In Observational studies, researchers observe the effect of a risk factor without changing what is exposed to it or its conditions. On the other hand, in an experimental study, researchers can introduce a change and study the effects of it.
Answer:
<em>significant others </em>
Explanation:
<em>In psychology, </em><em>the term "significant other" is referred to as someone who gives very great importance to a person's well-being or life. It is described as an individual or individuals that possess a strong influence on a person's self-concept. It defined a specific relationship between two different people who share a bond and do not possess a married relation but carry a joint responsibility for oneself and the other.</em>
<em>In reference to the question above, the given statement refers to the "significant others".</em>
<em> </em>
Answer:
The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment
Explanation:
The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment was a social research that sought to find out the natural history of syphilis, with the purpose of justifying treatment programs for blacks.
Termed as “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.” It started in 1932, and lasted till 1972, when it was discovered that the reasearch was conducted without the benefit of patients’ informed consent.
Following a governmental review of the study, it was concluded that, the subjects involved in the research had been misled and had not been given all the facts required to provide informed consent, hence, the study was considered to be "ETHICALLY UNJUSTIFIED" that is, the knowledge acquired was minute when compared with the risks the study posed for its subjects.
Therefore, The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment was an example of a major ethical mistake in the history of social research.