Answer:
$118,220
Explanation:
The Costs of Goods Sold COGS is calculated using the following formula.
COGS = Beginning inventory + purchases - Ending Inventory
For Azur company
Beginning inventory: 30,840
Ending inventory : 20,560
Net purchases equal Net purchase equal to purchases plus freight-in minus discounts freight-out are administrative expenses, hence do not feature in COGS
Net purchases =$102,800 + $15,420 -$ 10,280
Net purchases =$107,940
COGS = $30,840 +$107,940 -$20560
COGS = $118,220
Answer:
$76,100 net operating loss
Explanation:
The computation of the overall company net operating income (loss) is shown below:
= East sales - east Variable costs - east Traceable fixed costs - east Allocated common corporate costs - west Allocated common corporate costs
= $550,000 - $198,000 - $169,500 - $117,500 - $141,100
= -$76,100 loss
Since the west division is eliminated so all the items would be ignored except Allocated common corporate costs
Answer:
Both unethical collaboration and plagiarism
Explanation:
Unethical collaboration -
It refers to the practice of sharing common answers or words , is referred to as unethical collaboration .
For example , students copying the same answer is an example of unethical collaboration .
Plagiarism -
It refers to the method of copying some other person's work completely , without the legal consult of the person , is referred to as the practice of plagiarism .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is - Both unethical collaboration and plagiarism .
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": A moderately favorable situation in which Sharon’s relationships with her employees are strained, but where the employees are still doing highly structured tasks.
Explanation:
Austrian organizational psychologist Fred Fiedler (<em>1922-2017</em>) proposed in his Theory of Contingency that leaders only have one leadership style and that they cannot shape it according to the different situations they might be involved in. Instead, leaders must be located in a situation that matches their style.
Since Sharon's leadership style is <em>autocratic</em>, she is likely to manage herself better in adverse situations where the subordinates still follow her instructions.
Answer:
I don't know. I think a lot of the variability in wages would be due to statistical noise.
