Answer:
The excerpt informs the reader that there were likely inaccuracies in the report provided to the court.
Explanation:
The above statement most appropriately relates that how the author's purpose of the given frame and the excerpt are distinct. It reveals that 'the excerpt aims to inform the readers about the imprecision involved in the report that was presented to the court' as the report says 'Faryad had pellets in his left arm' which is logically false if he was sitting on the bicycle with Iqbal who had in the right side and hence, the frame asserts a different story. That's how both are different from each other.
Answer:
I believe it would be C. to show how quickly cities grew after 1860 due to immigration, migration, and industrialization
Hope I helped :)
Answer:
The answer is accomodation.
Explanation:
In psychology, accomodation means the modifying of existing knowledge when new information is presented. This occurs because we organise our knowledge in <u>schemas</u>, which are bits of data about a concept. In the example, Alfred's schemas of a horse may include a tall animal with four legs and a long face. When presented with new information (black and white stripes are common in zebras, not horses), he must change his previous knowledge of horses.
Frontal lobe of the brain has been affected in this injury
<h3>What is
brain?</h3>
The brain is a complicated organ that regulates our body's thought, memory, emotion, touch, motor skills, vision, breathing, temperature, and hunger. The central nervous system, or CNS, is made up of the brain and the spinal cord that extends from it.
The brain is one of the human body's largest and most complicated organs. It is made up of around 100 billion nerves that communicate through trillions of synapses. The brain is made up of various specialized sections that interact with one another: • The cortex is the brain's outermost layer of cells.
To know more about brain follow the link:
brainly.com/question/2193987
#SPJ4
Answer:
D. may ignore Sam's statement and continue asking questions until Sam makes an unambiguous request for an attorney.
Explanation:
Miranda right is also known as Miranda warnings sometimes. It is the right given to a suspect to remain silent and the right to have an attorney.
When an investigator is asking questions to the suspect person for a crime, the Supreme court says that after the suspect waives off the Miranda rights, the investigator can continue to interrogate him until the suspect makes clean and unambiguous request for a lawyer.
Thus in the context, Sam waives off the Miranda rights provided to him and is willing to give answers to the detective's question. But when he is not sure whether he wants a attorney or not, the detective under the Supreme Court rulings, can ignore his request and continue questioning Sam until he makes a clear request to have an attorney for himself.
Hence the answer is--
D. may ignore Sam's statement and continue asking questions until Sam makes an unambiguous request for an attorney.
