I believe the answer is:
C . filling military supply orders
Before our involvement in the world war II, united states adopt the policy of non-interventionist. Because of this, our country do not produce many military supplies because we never plan to enter any war. This cause us to have a very hard time in filling military supply order at the beginning of the war.
Answer:
I believe your answer would be d. pides
Explanation:
You have to identify in what time the sentence is written and the subjects or the subject that appears in it. In this case, the sentence is written in the present, so you could use any of the options however the subject is you.
The option a is discarded because it is used for us
Option b is used only in plural
Option c complements the self.
Therefore the correct verb that completes the statement is the option d that complements the subject you.
Please let me know if this helps!
sound argument has the feature that if the premises are true the conclusion is certain to be true.
A true conclusion is necessary for a good argument. TRUE: A sound argument has all true premises and is valid. As long as all of the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true, which is how a logical argument works.
A statement in an argument known as a premise serves as justification or support for the conclusion. An argument may contain one or more premises. In an argument, a conclusion is a declaration that summarizes the main points the arguer is attempting to persuade the reader or listener of. What does the argument seek to demonstrate?
To learn more about sound argument here
brainly.com/question/1327853
#SPJ4
<h2>Answer:</h2>
government office - an office where government employees work. jobcentre - a government office in a town where information about available jobs is displayed and where unemployment benefits are administered. land office - a government office where business relating to public lands is transacted.
Let me know if there is something weong to my answer ^_^
<h3>#CarryOnLearning</h3>
Answer:
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
Situation: Joe plays baseball, but has been on a bit of a slump, going 0 for 25 in his last at bats (zero hits for 25 chances). On Friday, Joe accidentally wore his socks inside out and hit two doubles and a homerun. Clearly, Joe thinks, it must be the socks. Joe wears them every game now. Question: What causal fallacy is this? post hoc fallacy.
It is a logical fallacy that follow that an event happens as a result of an event, the word is gotten from Latin which literally means "after this""therefore because of this"
