QUESTION 6 Answer: Passing the bar exam is both a necessary and a sufficient condition on becoming an attorney.
Explanation: Following is the chronology of steps that need to be followed to become an attorney.
1. Pursue a bachelor's degree course in any subject and pass it
2. Attempt the 'Law School Admission Test' and pass it.
3. Get a 'Juris Doctor' from a law school.
4. Pass the Bar Examination conducted by the Bar Council.
5. Acquire the license to practice law.
QUESTION 7 Answer: In the United States, winning the most electoral votes is both necessary and sufficient to be elected president.
Explanation: In the United States, the voting for the office of President is not done directly by the registered voters. Rather, the registered voters elect their representatives as electors. These electors together form a group named 'electoral college' which is entitled to vote in the presidential elections directly.
This form of election is called 'indirect election' in which the people choose their representatives and trust them to choose their President and Vice President.
The correct answer is A) the same as that of a buyer. To solicit orders and get ratification and acceptance from his or her employer.
The legal authority of a salesperson normally is the same as that of a buyer. To solicit orders and get ratification and acceptance from his or her employer.
That is the reason why a salesperson is hired for. He/she interacts with the consumer, offers the best deal possible according to the indications of the manager of the store, he/she offers a good explanation of the benefits of the product, answer questions, and generally treat the consumer in the best way possible to make it back soon and if its possible, create loyalty to the store. If the salesperson does a good job, it is rewarded. If not, some consequences could be legal in the case of a thief.
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
<u>(1) the power to make final decision</u> : authourity<u>
(2) approve</u> : ratify
<u>(3) someone who is not in military</u> : civilian
<u>(4) men who supported the constitution </u> : federalists
<u>(5) the 18 power of congress </u> : enumerated power
<u>(6) limits the actions of government leader</u> : rule of law
According to A<span>ndrew Cherlin, Americans are faced with the difficulty to commit to one person in his/her lifetime - a term called polyarmous. In actuality, this is not the case for americans only but can also be possible to all nationals. Love is always applicable to all.</span>
