Answer: B) Yes, especially if the people who are on a do dash not dash call registry have a trait that is not accurately represented by the remaining people in the sample
If the person conducting the survey wants a good random sample then they should take opinions from a broad audience, including people from different backgrounds, races, ages, cultures etc. In this case, the people that are not on the call registry most likely have a common trait that would explain why they're not in there (ie. they're too young to be eligible to be in the call registry, they are too old to be on the call registry, etc). Not calling them then would throw off the sample. Because of this, B is the correct answer.
Some people emotions are affected by the social opinions of others which they feel they to live up to a standard to fit in
Because the Hepburn Act strengthened existing government control of railroads.
The hepburn act gave united states federal law the right to <span>set maximum railroad rates and extend its jurisdiction. This means that the taxation expense that had to be paid by the railroad companies would be significantly higher compared to the period before hepburn Act</span>
Gezon and Kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer North Americans is
"an adaptation to poverty".
A significantly more typical response from researchers, in any case, was to recommend that discussing the way of life of the underclass was commensurate to "faulting the victim." Bad conduct and poor decisions, in this view, were a justifiable adaptation to poverty and the absence of chance in individuals' lives. In spite of the fact that my examination on the underclass was given a neighborly gathering, the greater part of the scholarly network has mixed around the view that awful practices are a result, as opposed to a reason, of poverty.
