Answer: $440
Steps:
Retrace the math. Your total at the end was $22.00, before that you had a 10% tax so you multiply the tax in order to retrace that step. Next, multiply is by 2 as the 50% discount which gets you to $440
A.) P(defective | foo) = P(defective & foo)/P(foo)
4% = P(defective & foo)/30% . . . . . . . . . plug in the given data
0.04*0.30 = P(defective & foo) = 0.012 = 1.2%
The probability that a widget was produced at the foo factory and is defective is 1.2%.
b.) P(defective | foo) ≠ P(defective) (4% ≠ 5%), so the events P(defective) and P(foo) are NOT independent.
c.) P(foo | defective) = P(defective & foo)/P(defective)
P(foo | defective) = 1.2%/5% = 24%
The probability that a widget was produced at the foo factory given it is defective is 24%.
Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
4567<853344464_p4356789
The answer is: -1/5 or -0.2
One side of the original triangle is 15 units long and the side of the equivalent side of the dilated triangle is 3 units long. Therefore the magnitude of the enlargement scale factor is 3/15 or 1/5;
The answer is -1/5 as the transformation resulted in an inversion as well as an enlargement/dilation, therefore the answer is negative.
