The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
Answer:
Matching the theories to what the theories proposed:
✔️Multiple factors impact the climax community ➡️polyclimax theory
✔️The entire environment impacts the climax community➡️climax pattern theory
✔️Only climate impacts the climax community➡️monoclimax theory
Polyclimax theory: This proposes that there are more than one vegetation climax. It is controlled by soil moisture, topography, fire and activities of animal.
Climax pattern theory: This theory proposes that the species structure, ecosystem and balance of the climax are determined and impacted by the entire and total environment found in the ecosystem.
Monoclimax theory: This proposes that only climate impacts the climax community. It identifies that every region actually has one climax community. It's by it all communities are developing.
Federal, Because it affects National Security.
The answer is: state governments
When the immigrants come into united states, they will settle on the states and will most likely have to settle to find a job in that states.
Because of this, the number of employment in that states could be threaten if the increase in the amount of workers far surpassed the increase in the amount of job opportunities. The state government would be the one that is responsible to bear such challenge.
Answer:
overcome functional fixedness
Explanation:
Functional fixedness: It is often referred to as a cognitive bias that hinders a person's perception to utilize an object only it has always been used traditionally.
According to Karl Duncker, functional fixedness is a mental block for using an object differently to solve a problem.
A person can overcome functional fixedness through attempts at recombination, for example, generic parts technique.
From the above scenario, it can be concluded that Monique has overcome functional fixedness.