<span>When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which implement them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal that, they are endowed by their creator with certain unAlienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, government are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principals and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mandmknd are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. </span>
Answer:
b) when they are unhappy and their prospects seem brighter elsewhere
Explanation:
<u>Those who have been unhappy for some time usually decide to separate and divorce, but this is not the only factor.</u><u> Usually what follows is that there is an available alternative option that seems more fortunate, kind of the reward (like saving money, obtaining a degree, saving contacts with someone who doesn't support their decision to stay in that union, etc.) </u>
The author says that the bottom line is not just unhappiness, <u>but that in some way the prospect of the divorce is in favor of some other option and elsewhere. </u>
As per the information, Tammy is viewing Indian culture through a cultural bias.
<h3 /><h3>What is a cultural bias?</h3>
It is the perception, analysis and judgment of the habits and behaviors of a cultural group according to its own culture, not understanding the fact that there is cultural diversity in the world, where values and social norms are different.
Therefore, cultural bias can be reduced through the dissemination of information and knowledge, to reduce negative stereotypes and promote cultural diversity and ethics.
Find out more about cultural bias here:
brainly.com/question/2500538
#SPJ1
<u>Answer:</u> The decisions to ban and then reinstate eligibility in the Oscar Pistorius case raises questions about the "process through which deviance is defined in sports".
<u>Explanation:</u>
South African athlete Oscar Pistorius was on court charged with the murder of his 29-year-old model and law graduate girlfriend named Reeva Steenkamp at his home in Pretoria on 14 February 2013.
Pistorius is a leading South African runner and gained recognition as a high-level athlete with a disability, including several Paralympic Games and the 2012 Summer Olympics.
The judgment given by the Judge named Thokozile Masipa that Pistorius was not guilty of murder but guilty of Steenkamp's culpable homicide (unlawful killing of a person with or without intent to kill, depending on how the crime has been defined by a particular jurisdiction).
Soon after Pistorius was banned by sports authority, his arrest and later imprisonment was big shock among media and people. But later his eligibility was reinstated which raised questions about the "process through which deviance is defined in sports" and opposed by many people.
Answer:?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Explanation:
