Answer:
f(n) = 2 * f(n - 1) + 1
Step-by-step explanation:
First, notice that the difference between each neighboring term is different, so it is not linear, so we can rule out A and B. Now, it's all about finding a pattern. Eventually, through guess and check, you will get 2 * f(n - 1) + 1.
Perhaps there was a typo in C? Idk!!
Answer: a. reject the null hypothesis, church attendance and marital status are dependent
Step-by-step explanation:
- If the obtained chi-square value is greater than the critical chi square value then we reject the null hypothesis.
Given : A Chi square test has been conducted to assess the relationship between marital status and church attendance. The obtained Chi square is 23.45 and the critical Chi square is 9.488.
Null hypothesis : There is no relationship between the variables.
Alternative hypothesis : There is a relationship between the variables.
Here we can see that the obtained chi-square (23.45) value is greater than the critical chi square value (9.488) , then we have to reject the null hypothesis.
So the correct answer is reject the null hypothesis, church attendance and marital status are dependent.
Answer:
Your table might look something like this:
The dads steps:
3
6
9
12
15
18
Sons steps:
5
10
15
20
25
30
You can notice the pattern. If dad walks 3 steps, son walks 5. If dad walks another 3, son walks another 5. And so on. This means dad walks 12 steps when the sin walks 20 steps.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio is 3:5. This means dad wlaks 3 steps so son must walk 5 steps basically. So.......... You can now create the table. Y I just have to multiply or divide each side ( of the colon:) so. Whatever you do to one side, you do to the other side. If you x3 on one side, you do it to other. Same goes for division. In the 'table' I did above, I x2 to get 6 and 10. Then I took the 3 and the 5 again and timsed those by 3. You can also change the 6 and the 10. So:
3:5
Then x2
6:10
Then I take the top layer (you can either choose to change the top layer, or layer above as long as you do the same thing to each side. Remember, only x and ÷. No + or-.) and I x3
9:15
Then I could take 9 and 15 and x5
45:75
It's crazy that all these. Ratios mena the same thing! 45 steps from dad would take the son 75 steps. You can also divide the last ratio of 45:75 to find the one you started with, 3:5.
So you get the idea.
It is probably best to do what I did in the table in the answer part because I did a pattern. Take the top layer, and x2, then x3, then x4, ect. Rather then doing random things.
Answer:
4/3
Step-by-step explanation:
reduce the fraction by a factor of 6
pretty sure you mean write 24/18 in simplest form so that's the answer
Hope this helps! :)
Step-by-step explanation:
3y+5<10
3y<10-5
3y<5
y<⅗
