All categories

3 years ago

Help 50 points and brainlest for answers to all the photos

Mathematics

2 answers:

torisob [31]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

1. Is 6 and 6/7

2. Is 25/56

3. Is 3/16

4. Is 4 and 1/3

5. Is 26

Step-by-step explanation:

Let me know if you need this

Marta_Voda [28]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

1. 6 6/7

2. 25/56

3. 3/16

4. 4 1/3

5. 26

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in

there were three full pizzas sitting on the counter. if joe ate 1/4 of a pizza,rhoda at 3/8 of a pizza,and chris ate 4 slices, h

IrinaK [193]

ANSWER:
15 SLICES

Explanation:
Joe ate 2 slices (1/4 = 2/8), Rhoda ate 3 (3/8), Chris ate 4.
2+3+4= 9.
There are 3 pizzas divided into 8 slices per pizza.
3 x 8 = 24 ; 24 SLICES TOTAL
Subtract 9 (that’s what was consumed) from 24.
24-9 = 15 ; 15 SLICES LEFT OVER

pls mark brainliest hehe

6 0

3 years ago

Galen sold tickets for his church’s carnival for a total of $2,820. Children’s tickets cost $3 each and adult tickets cost $5 ea

Veronika [31]

Answer:

a = 195 ; c = 615

Step-by-step explanation:

So, you want to start by forming your equations...

I will use 'c' for children and 'a' for adults for my variables

3a + 30 = c

(this is because of the info that 30 more tickets than 3 times the amount of children's were sold than adult)

then for equation 2:

3c + 5a = 2820

(this is because of the prices of the tickets and the total money raised)

Then, plug in the equation for c

Your equation should look like:

3(3a + 30) + 5a = 2820

You get:

(9a +90) + 5a = 2820

Then:

14a = 2730

So:

a = 195 adult tickets sold

Plug in a, to find c:

3 (195) + 30 = c

585 + 30 = c

c = 615 children tickets sold

4 0

3 years ago

Which of the following situations could be modeled by an exponential function?

Sauron [17]

Answer: Option D.

Step-by-step explanation:

An exponential function is something like:

f(x) = A*(r)^x

Where:

A = initial amount.

r = rate of growth

x = variable.

This type of function is used to describe situations like "you have A dollars, and it increases by 30% each week"

or:

"There is a population of A animals, and it doubles each year"

Let's analyze briefly all the given options and see which one is an exponential function.

A) The water level of a tank decreases by 5 gallons every day.

This is a linear relation, if W is the initial amount of water, and x is the number of days, then the water level of the tank after x days is:

y = W - 5 gal*x

B) The amount of money collected by a charity increases by $5,000 each year.

The amount collected increases $5000 each year.

Then if in year 1 they collected A.

in year 2 they collected A + $5000

in year 3 they collected A + 2*$5000

We already can see the pattern, this is a linear relation:

in year X they colected A + (X - 1)*$5000

C) A tree was 10 feet tall when purchased and grows at a rate of 2 feet per year.

if y is the height of the tree, and x is the number of years, this can be written as:

y = 10ft + x*2ft

Again, a linear relation.

D) The number of people in a stadium is decreasing at a rate of 45% every 10 minutes.

Let's define x as each "lapse" of 10 minutes that passes.

If N is the initial number of people in te stadium, then after 10 minutes the number of people is = N*(1 - 45%/100%) = N*(1 - 0.45) = N*0.55

After another 10 minutes, the population decreases again.

N*0.55*(1 - 45%/100%) = N*0.55*0.55 = N*0.55^2

We can see the pattern here, this can be written as

People(x) = N*(0.55)^x

This is an exponential function.

3 0

3 years ago

A study of pollutants showed that certain industrial emissions should not exceed 2.3 parts per million. You believe a particular

Musya8 [376]

Answer:

$t=\frac{3.3-2.3}{\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{9}}}=7.5$

The degrees of freedom are given by:

$df=n-1=9-1=8$

And the p value would be:

$p_v =P(t_{(8)}>7.5)=0.0000346$

Since the p value is lower than the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 2.3 ppm the safe limit

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

$\bar X=3.3$ represent the sample mean in ppm

$s=0.4$ represent the sample standard deviation

$n=9$ sample size

$\mu_o =2.3$ represent the value to verify

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level

t would represent the statistic

$p_v$ represent the p value

System of hypothesis

We want to verify if the true mean is higher than 2,3 ppm, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu \leq 2.3$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu > 2.3$

The statistic for this case is given by:

$t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}$ (1)

Replacing the info given we got:

$t=\frac{3.3-2.3}{\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{9}}}=7.5$

The degrees of freedom are given by:

$df=n-1=9-1=8$

And the p value would be:

$p_v =P(t_{(8)}>7.5)=0.0000346$

Since the p value is lower than the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 2.3 ppm the safe limit

6 0

4 years ago

The table shows the air temperature in degrees Celsius at different altitudes in kilometers:

miv72 [106K]

Answer:

Third graph, I took the test

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago