1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vodomira [7]
3 years ago
11

Which of the following groups was the last to receive their right to vote?

Law
1 answer:
Svet_ta [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

18 year old citizens

Explanation:

Democracy can be defined as a government of the people, by the people and for the people.

There are two (2) main types of democracy and these include;

I. Representative democracy: it's also known as indirect democracy and can be defined as a form of government which typically involves the process of having the citizens of a particular country vote to elect representatives (political leaders) to enact laws, create policies and make decisions on their behalf.

II. Direct democracy: it can be defined as a process which typically involves the candidates voting for their preferred choice. Thus, their choices are reflected directly on the subject matter.

In the United States of America, the eighteen (18) year old citizens were the last to receive their right to vote. This right was established by the 26th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

The 26th Amendment was proposed by the US Congress on the 23rd of March, 1971 and ratified on the 1st of July, 1971 by three-fourths of the states to become part of the Constitution of the United States of America.

You might be interested in
What is the major function of the legislative branch of the government?
Alina [70]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
3 years ago
How does the law protect human traffickin​
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

they find culprits and bust down their doors

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Through open market operations, the Federal Reserve buys and sells government securities to influence the supply of bank reserve
levacccp [35]

When the Fed wants to increase excess reserves held by banks it buys bonds.

Option A

<u>Explanation:</u>

From the given case, if the federal bank wants to increase excess reserves it can increase the supply of money lowering the reserve requirement.

This in turn will increase the excess reserves in the system there by giving boost the economy by lending loans for infrastructure development and manufacturing sector.

By the way of central bank buying bonds in the open market it will increase the supply of money into the economy by exchanging bonds for cash from the general public.

5 0
3 years ago
Which statement about a theory is true?
lys-0071 [83]
D makes more sense so try D
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In September, Amina hired Bryan as a delivery man. Bryan was to commence work on 1 November. On 1 October, Amina wrote to Bryan
    14·1 answer
  • The typical first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation is called:A. RemediationB. The adjudicationC. The a
    11·1 answer
  • Emergence of federalism in Nigeria​
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone help me ???​
    6·1 answer
  • How are states government similar to and different from national government?
    12·1 answer
  • why do guy keep telling us to smile. plz stop we will smile when we wanna not when we are told to. unless pics of course
    6·2 answers
  • Discuss the effect of absence of rule of law​​
    15·1 answer
  • Please help
    9·2 answers
  • Who becomes the<br> President if there is a<br> tie for President AND<br> Vice-President?
    11·2 answers
  • Why is Civic virtue considered a part of a true democracy?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!