1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Grace [21]
3 years ago
12

Can you help me with this ​

Law
1 answer:
Vinil7 [7]3 years ago
3 0
Since they know you they might help you out instead of giving their honest opinion
You might be interested in
Which of the following is an example of cooperative federalism? (Select all that apply.)
barxatty [35]

Answer:

I think the answer is the 2nd, and 4th one.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The legislation that attempted to overturn the Helling precedent has been on the books since 1974 but has had little effect. Why
Margaret [11]

Answer:

Explanation:

Although it has been attempted to overturn the ruling in the Helling case, I would suppose that these attempts have been unsuccessful because the ruling was in favor of a higher standard of care than what was deemed appropriate by for the ophthalmologists. One might argue that the ruling has remained in place because holding the defendants liable was, in a way, a step towards checking the medical profession’s privilege to set it’s own standards. I feel as though legislature has probably not seen fit to reinforce it because the original ruling remains valid in that a doctor can follow all of the standards of care, and still be liable.

6 0
3 years ago
Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni
alisha [4.7K]

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
True or false
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What refers to any instrument or weapon used in a death, such as a knife or firearm?
anygoal [31]

Answer:

Mechanism of Death

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Brainliest?

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Another word for ownership in stocks or real estate is _____
    13·2 answers
  • _______ is the constitutional principle that the law making
    9·1 answer
  • When might anarchy be effective
    11·1 answer
  • What is the role of government in today’s society?
    10·1 answer
  • Wjehfbeugeughdkuvkduvuhdfbfvubkdbvkdbkbv
    11·2 answers
  • What must you do when you reach a STOP sign?
    6·1 answer
  • The difference between a delegation of duty in a transferable contract and a
    12·2 answers
  • What is the most commonly used insanity defense?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not related to malpractice insurance limitations?
    7·1 answer
  • The Federal Trade Commission and the Security and Exchange Commission are examples of executive departments.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!