1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yaroslaw [1]
2 years ago
15

Sasha is the manager at a factory.

Mathematics
1 answer:
FromTheMoon [43]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Hi

I think the answer is 80 employees.

Step-by-step explanation:

15 employees - 390 wardrobes

Therefore 1200 divided by 15 equals 80

You might be interested in
4 p 2x + 3p 7x<br> Help please
suter [353]

Answer:

Hope this helps :O

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
(7−4n)⋅6 Apply the distributive property to create an equivalent expression.
avanturin [10]

Answer:

42-24n

Step-by-step explanation:

(7 - 4n) . 6

= (7)(6) - (4n)(6) ...........using distributive property, multiply each term by (6)

= 42 -24n (answer)

7 0
3 years ago
2/5 of the fish in Brayden's fish tank are guppies. 3/5 of the guppies are red. What fraction of the fish in Brayden's tank are
Nutka1998 [239]

Answer:

6/25 of the fish are red guppies.

Step-by-step explanation:

2/5 of the fish in Gary's fish tank are guppies.

Out of 2/5 the  of the fish in Gary's fish tank  3/5 of the guppies are red.

So, The fraction of fish in Gary's tank are red guppies = 3/5 x 2/5

=6/25

Hope this helps!

4 0
3 years ago
Prove why 2,5,8,11 and 14 are not perfect squares?​
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

because there is an exact square number such as:4,9

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
g Given the following premises: (1) a∧(b∨a) (2) ~c→~a (3) ~g→~a (4) g→e (5)~(d∨h) Prove the Conclusion: c∧~h?
KIM [24]

Answer:

See the argument below

Step-by-step explanation:

I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.

First, let's conclude c.

(1)⇒a  by simplification of conjunction

a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation

¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens

¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation

Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.

An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:

By contradiction proof, assume h is true.

h⇒d∨h by addition

(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.    

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Plzzzzzzzzzzz helpppppppppppppp
    11·1 answer
  • Claudia makes an initial deposit of $50 into her bank account. She deposits $20 into the account each week. Let x represent the
    14·1 answer
  • If Argentina is capable of producing up to 200 airplanes or 500 shirts in a year, and Brazil could produce 1000 airplanes or 800
    13·1 answer
  • Write the rule for each table
    5·2 answers
  • 517 37/50 + 312 3/100
    6·1 answer
  • During the month of July, we only had 0.1573 inches of rain. What is this, rounded to the nearest thousandth? O 0.2 O 0.158 0.15
    9·1 answer
  • Neda sells televisions. She earns a fixed amount for each television and an additional $15 if
    11·1 answer
  • A class of 80 girls and 60 boys sponsored a car
    10·2 answers
  • Kindly help out with this question!
    10·2 answers
  • If m varies directly with n , and m = 8 when n = 24 . what is the value of n when m = 12
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!