<span>His reaction best illustrates the impact of intuition. Intuition is a knowledge that arises without performing a conscious analysis or reasoning. The subconscious performs an analysis based on schemes stored in long-term memory, and based on this analysis makes an inference, which is not necessarily correct or incorrect, about the situation. <span>This analysis by its unconscious and rapid character on many occasions is erroneous.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
Answer:
wiped out 1/4 - 1/3 of all Europeans
wiped out farming communities
caused riots and hysteria
has reappeared over and over again, even in current times
Explanation:
If this is on Odyssey, I took the quiz
Akhenaten (pronounced /ˌækəˈnɑːtən/),[8] also spelled Echnaton,[9] Akhenaton,[3] Ikhnaton,[2] and Khuenaten[10][11] (Ancient Egyptian: ꜣḫ-n-jtn, meaning "Effective for the Aten"), was an ancient Egyptian pharaoh reigning c. 1353–1336[3] or 1351–1334 BC,[4] the tenth ruler of the Eighteenth Dynasty. Before the fifth year of his reign, he was known as Amenhotep IV (Ancient Egyptian: jmn-ḥtp, meaning "Amun is satisfied", Hellenized as Amenophis IV).
Akhenaten
Amenhotep IV
Amenophis IV, Naphurureya, Ikhnaton[1][2]
Statue of Akhenaten in the early Amarna style
Statue of Akhenaten in the early Amarna style
Pharaoh
Reign
1353–1336 BC[3]
1351–1334 BC[4]
(18th Dynasty of Egypt)
Predecessor
Amenhotep III
Successor
Smenkhkare
Royal titulary
Consort
Nefertiti
Kiya
An unidentified sister-wife (most likely)
Tadukhipa
Children
Smenkhkare?
Meritaten
Meketaten
Ankhesenamun
Neferneferuaten Tasherit
Neferneferure
Setepenre
Tutankhamun (most likely)
Ankhesenpaaten Tasherit?
Meritaten Tasherit?
Father
Amenhotep III
Mother
Tiye
Died
1336 or 1334 BC
Burial
Royal Tomb of Akhenaten, Amarna (original tomb)
KV55 (disputed)
[6][7]
Monuments
Akhetaten, Gempaaten
Religion
Ancient Egyptian religion
Atenism
Akhenaten is noted for abandoning Egypt's traditional polytheistic religion and introducing Atenism, worship centered on Aten. The views of Egyptologists differ whether Atenism should be considered as absolute monotheism, or whether it was monolatry, syncretism, or henotheism.[12][13] This culture shift away from traditional religion was not widely accepted. After his death, Akhenaten's monuments were dismantled and hidden, his statues were destroyed, and his name excluded from lists of rulers compiled by later pharaohs.[14] Traditional religious practice was gradually restored, notably under his close successor Tutankhamun, who changed his name from Tutankhaten early in his reign.[15] When some dozen years later rulers without clear rights of succession from the Eighteenth Dynasty founded a new dynasty, they discredited Akhenaten and his immediate successors, referring to Akhenaten himself as "the enemy" or "that criminal" in archival records.[16][17]
Akhenaten was all but lost to history until the late 19th century discovery of Amarna, or Akhetaten, the new capital city he built for the worship of Aten.[18] Furthermore, in 1907, a mummy that could be Akhenaten's was unearthed from the tomb KV55 in the Valley of the Kings by Edward R. Ayrton. Genetic testing has determined that the man buried in KV55 was Tutankhamun's father,[19] but its identification as Akhenaten has since been questioned.[6][7][20][21][22]
Akhenaten's rediscovery and Flinders Petrie's early excavations at Amarna sparked great public interest in the pharaoh and his queen Nefertiti. He has been described as "enigmatic", "mysterious", "revolutionary", "the greatest idealist of the world", and "the first individual in history", but also as a "heretic", "fanatic", "possibly insane", and "mad".[12][23][24][25][26] The interest comes from his connection with Tutankhamun, the unique style and high quality of the pictorial arts he patronized, and ongoing interest in the religion he attempted to establish.
Answer:
structural perspective
Explanation:
The structural as well as the functional perspective is an approach in the field of sociology which sees the society as a complex system that works together in order to promote stability and solidarity.
The functional perspective of poverty shows the side of the poverty that it exists in the society for some positive function of the society. It states that there is some positive aspects of poverty in the society.
While the structural perspective of poverty depicts the structure of the society that causes the poverty in the society die to the potholes in the structure of the economy.
In the context, Mathew who is preparing a presentation on poverty must include the structural perspective of the poverty in his presentation so that people are aware of this potholes or drawbacks in the society and be able to get rid of poverty and live a good life.
The answers to your question are,
Factory equipment was dangerous to operate, A typical work shift might be twelve to sixteen hours long, and There was little government regulation of workplaces.<span>
I hope this helps you!
</span>
