Please answer correctly !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Will mark brainliest !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Problem 11-3 blair & rosen, inc. (b&r) is a brokerage firm that specializes in investment portfolios designed to meet th

Artyom0805 [142]

Linear programming which shows the best investment strategy for the client is Max Z=0.12I +0.09B and subject to constraints are :I+ B<=25000,

0.005 I +0.004B<=250.

Given maximum investment client can make is $55000, annual return= 9%, The investment advisor requires that at most $25,000 of the client's funds should be invested in the internet fund. The internet fund, which is the more risky of the two investment alternatives, has a risk rating of 5 per thousand dollars invested. the blue chip fund has a risk rating of 4 per thousand dollars invested.

We have to make a linear programming problem.

Let

I= Internet fund investment in thousands.

B=Blue chip fund investment in thousands.

Objective function:

Max Z=0.12I+0.09B

subject to following constraints:

Investment amount: I+ B<=25000

Risk Rating: 5/100* I+4/100*B<=250 or 0.005 I +0.004B<=250

I,B>=0.

Hence the objective function is Max Z=0.12 I+ 0.09 B.

Learn more about LPP at brainly.com/question/25828237

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago

Darin randomly selects a marble from a jar that contains only red and green marbles. Which of these could be the probability tha

Luden [163]

Answer:

E

Step-by-step explanation:

There are both red and green marbles in the jar. The answer cannot be A or D because that would mean that there's 1.14% or 1.04% green marbles. But we know that there's less than that in the and bag. And there are also red marbles. B and F do not work because there can't be a negative amount of marbles in the bag.

8 0

3 years ago

Two angles with measures (6x + 60) and (90) are supplementary. What is the value of x?

marshall27 [118]

Supplementary angles add up to 180, so
6x+60+90 = 180 and solve for x
6x= 30
x=5

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A local police chief claims that 31% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 27% of

Elis [28]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.27 -0.31}{\sqrt{\frac{0.31(1-0.31)}{500}}}=-1.933$

$p_v =P(Z$

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted is not significanlty less than 0.31.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=500 represent the random sample taken

X represent the number of arrests that were not prosecuted.

$\hat p=0.27$ estimated proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted

$p_o=0.31$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.02$ represent the significance level

Confidence=98% or 0.98

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is less than 0.31.:

Null hypothesis: $p\geq 0.31$

Alternative hypothesis: $p < 0.31$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

3) Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.27 -0.31}{\sqrt{\frac{0.31(1-0.31)}{500}}}=-1.933$

4) Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.02$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z$

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted is not significanlty less than 0.31.

3 0

3 years ago

M is directionly proptional to r squared

sergejj [24]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

A) 504

B) 8

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement of proportionality can be written as the equation ...

m = kr²

Then we can find k from ...

k = m/r² = 14/2² = 7/2

That is, ...

m = (7/2)r²

__

Using this relation, we can find m for r=12:

m = (7/2)·12² = 7·72

m = 504 . . . for r = 12

__

And, we can use the same equation to solve for r when m=224.

224 = 7/2·r²

r² = 64

r = √64

r = 8 . . . for m = 224

4 0

2 years ago