Answer:
B is the correct one. Second.
Yes..The answer s D. because the circles are congruent and in the question, it stated that it wanted circles that were similar, not congruent
<span>
Let's analyze Hannah's work, step-by-step, to see if she made any mistakes. </span>In Step 1, Hannah wrote

<span> as the sum of two separate derivatives </span>

<span>using the </span><span>sum rule.
</span>
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 2,

was kept as it is, and

was rewritten as

using the constant rule.Indeed, according to the constant rule, the derivative of a constant number is equal to zero.
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 3,

was rewritten as

supposedly using the constant multiple rule.
The problem is that according to the constant multiple rule,

should be rewritten as

and not as

.
<span>
Therefore, Hannah made a mistake in this step.</span>
Answer:
y-coordinate = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider the below diagram attached with this question.
Section formula:
If a point divides a line segment in m:n whose end points are
and
, then the coordinates of that point are

From the below graph it is clear that the coordinates of end points are J(1,-10) and K(7,2). A point divides the line JK is 5:1.
Using section formula, the coordinates of that point are




Therefore, the y-coordinate of the point that divides the directed line segment from J to k into a ratio of 5:1 is 0.
Answer:
the first one is no it's nonproportional
and the second one it yes its proportional