Complete question:
On January 1. Year 1. White Co. sold a property with a remaining useful life of 20 years to Blue Co. for $900.000. At the same time. White entered into a contract with Blue for the right to use the property (leaseback) for a period of 6 years. with annual rental payments of 580.000 that approximate the market rental payments for similar properties. On January 1. Year 1. the carrying amount of the property was 5680.000. and its fair value was 5770.000. A discount rate for the lease of 10% is used by both White and Blue. The present value factor for an ordinary annuity at 10% for 6 periods is 4.3553. The lease does not transfer the property to White at the end of the lease term and does not include a purchase option.
What amount of lease expense for the right of use of the property is recognised by White in Year 1 ?
A. $0
B. $130,000
C. $90,000
D. $220,000
Answer:
$90,000 amount of lease expense for the right of use of the property is recognised by White in Year 1
Explanation:
If the leaseback is known as an operating lease, the original transition to the buyer-lessor of the asset should be taken into account as the selling of an asset, given that all the income identification requirements have been fulfilled.
If the deal is of equal value, the lender lease is informed of the gain or loss of sale between the purchase price and the sum of the land that is held. Yet this is not a equal value trade. The property's sale price is higher than its market value. Accordingly, the income or loss on sale seems to be the difference between the equal worth and the value of the land.
Therefore, on 1 January, White records a benefit of $90,000 in revenue of $770,000 (fair value of $680,000 in carrying amounts)
Answer:
Start keeping a budget
Explanation:
All of the financial guidance from experts won’t mean much if you don’t know where your money is going every month. Start tracking your spending and set up a budget using a simple spreadsheet or website apps.
Sunday or Monday, depending on what loacation.
<span>The question refers to whether that scenario describes a competitive market, and the answer is - no. This scenario that you have presented us with is not an example of a competitive market because there is no free entry. Because firms cannot freely enter this market, this cannot be said to be competitive, because there are no companies to compete if there is only one firm involved. </span>
Answer:
a) 39.304%
b) 67.91%
c) 14.17%
Explanation:
a. Given"
Offer terms = 1.8/10
Now,
The Effective annual interest rate is given as:
= 
on substituting the respective values, we get
= 
= 0.39304
or
= 39.304%
similarly,
b. for 2.8/10 net 30
Effective annual interest rate = 
= 0.6791
or
= 67.91%
c. for 1.8/10 net 60
Effective annual interest rate = 
= 0.1417
or
= 14.17%
