Because I would like to learn etc. how to manage and what it takes to open a restraunt. ?
It will be expected that the difference between a company's market value and book value should <u>be larger than</u> a company with mostly physical and financial assets if the large portion of company value is in intellectual and human assets.
<h3>What is an intellectual/human assets?</h3>
These are asset possessed by a firm that ranges from human capital, information capital, brand awareness, instructional capital etc.
These are assets that can be improved when a firm hires better employees, conduct training programs, develops new patents etc
In conclusion, since the large portion of company value is in intellectual and human assets, then, the market/book value would be larger than a company with mostly physical/financial assets.
Read more about assets
<em>brainly.com/question/25504767</em>
Answer:
A = $2,989.30
B = $2,722.33
C = $2,483.68
D = $2,455.65
E = $2,441.08
Explanation:
Given:
Future value (A) = $4,000
Present value (P) = ?
Number of Year (N) = 5.
A. R = 6% = 0.06
B. R = 8% = 0.08
C. R = 10% = 0.1
D. R= 10/2 = 5% N=5*2 = 10
E. R = 10/4 = 2.5% N = 5*4 = 20
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
Well mainly extemporaneous speeches can be hard, finding the right words without advanced notice may not be for every speaker. But trust me! No need to worry..... :) The extemporaneous speech is a perfect balance!!!!! This speech involves the speaker's use of notes and some embellishment to deliver a speech. To clear this up, a speaker who uses this method would have note cards or prompts that guide him from point to point, but he uses his own words as he goes along. What makes this different than an impromptu speech is that he has a loose guideline for his speech. He did not memorize anything....... he just used cues to know where to go next.
There are advantages but there are disadvantages to this type of speech sadly..... :( For one, the audience will think you are a genius. You used few notes and appeared to know everything about the topic. But this is not something that can be done quickly. The same fact finding and research used for other types of speeches must be used here. The speaker also must rehearse this speech for timing, rhythm and flow. Now, if shooting from the hip is not your style, you may want to consider reading your speech!!!! :) But ya. I hope this is better. XD sorry about that.
