I believe the answer is: <span> Tell her where to find the information that she needs.
Since that associate has the ability to finish the work herself, directly helping her would only prevented her from becoming responsible for their own duty.
But that being said, you still need to help her since she's most likely still a novice and does not fully understand the full job description. Because of this, telling her where she can find the information/instruction would be the best option.</span>
Explanation:
to have been in an error, and to have persisted in it, when it is detected, ruins both reputation and fortune.
Answer: Make good use of your location
Plan your garden layout
Grow recommended varieties
Obtain good seed, plants, equipment and supplies
Prepare and care for the soil property
Explanation: I searched it up
They found water in rivers or other places & they would boil it so it wouldn’t be much bacteria so they won’t get sick. Idk if this helps but i tried.
When testing a hypothesis using a null hypothesis, you use a statement that negates your hypothesis, and, within a certain level of certainty, see if the null hypothesis can be rejected. When testing the null hypothesis, you typically want to be around 95% sure that you can reject it (confidence interval is 95%).
In Rose's case, she is testing the hypothesis that there is a correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior.
Her null hypothesis would be:
"There is not a positive correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior"
or
"The correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior is less than or equal to zero"
