All categories

3 years ago

Explain whether it is fair for employers to judge Miguel based on his social media usage.

Business

1 answer:

MrRa [10]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

No, it will not be fair at all in judging any employee on the basis of his or her social media usage, until or unless that employee is interfering in any of the organisational domain in a negative way. Its the basic right of any worker that he can spend his private time in whatever way he or she likes. Social media has become one the important needs in the modern world today, if an employee is using social media for his private leisure time than it all depends on him or her BUT the usage of social media in the working hours should be seen carefully and the employee must restrict himself from it during his official working hours.

You might be interested in

Hurricane Industries had a net income of $129,650 and paid 40 percent of this amount to shareholders in dividends. During the ye

oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

a. 28390

Explanation:

Stockholders cash flow is the net of cash inflows from stockholders and cash outflows to stockholders.

Net Income = $129,650

Payout Ratio = 40%

Cash outflow

Amount of Dividend Paid = $129,650 x 40% = $51,860

Cash Inflow

Common stock issue = $80,250

Net Stockholder's cash flow = $80,250 - $51,860

Net Stockholder's cash flow = $28,390

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

During the month of March, Munster Company's employees earned wages of $64,000. Withholdings related to these wages were $4,896

STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

A) March 31 journal entries for wages expense and wages payable

Dr Salaries and Wages Expense account 64,000
Cr FICA Taxes Payable account 4,896
Cr Federal Income Tax Payable account 7,500
Cr State Income Tax Payable account 3,100
Cr Union Dues Payable account 400
Cr Salaries and Wages Payable account 48,104

B) March 31 journal entries for company's payroll tax expenses

Dr Payroll Tax Expense account 5,596
Cr FICA Taxes Payable account 4,896
Cr State Unemployment account 700

8 0

3 years ago

Suppose tickets for a regular seat at Super Bowl XXXVII cost just $500 when bought at face value (the cost at the box office). S

kakasveta [241]

Answer:

e. The monetary price paid to obtain the ticket.

Explanation:

The opportunity cost represent the best rejected alternative of the resources used.

If a person goes to the Super Bowl, the opportunity cost is any other entertainment show it renounce to see and any other use of the 500 dollar it used to acquire the ticket.

6 0

3 years ago

A purchaser paid $403.10 for a TV that cost the seller $290. If the seller's markup was 39% of the $290 cost, then what would be

CaHeK987 [17]

Percent markup based on the selling price: 28.1%

Explanation:

The cost of the TV for the seller was

$c=\$290$

Of this, the markup of this price was 39%. Therefore, the value of the markup (in dollars) with respect to the cost for the seller was

$m=0.39\cdot 290 =\$113.1$

So, this was the markup relative to the cost for the seller.

The price paid by the purchaser instead is

$p=\$403.1$

Therefore, the percent markup based on the selling price (paid by the purchaser) is:

$\frac{m}{p}\cdot 100 = \frac{113.1}{403.1}\cdot 100 =0.281\cdot 100 = 28.1\%$

Learn more about percentages:

brainly.com/question/82877

brainly.com/question/1834017

#LearnwithBrainly

5 0

3 years ago

Which of the following factors does not affect the initial market price of a stock?

MissTica

Answer:

The correct answer is (C)

Explanation:

Generally the common stocks worth per share is normally a limited quantity, for example, $0.05 or $0.01 and it has no association with the market estimation of the price of stock. The standard worth is once in a while referred to as the regular stocks. The par value has no connection with the price of the stock.

7 0

3 years ago